Crawdaddy wrote:You are repeating yourself. Account for the observed transition in emission from the cavity mathematically. The nature paper did. It should be easy for a man of your talents.
Maybe if you actually started to reply to my objections with something more deep than a "read their paper" I will not have anymore the need to repeat my points in reply to your (same) statements.
This experiment was well executed and, in my opinion, did indeed find something new. Unfortunately all their claims and math are based on the hypothesis
that what they are observing are indeed photons AND NOT, as example, polaritons or an excitons-polaritons mixture.
I would expect them to experimentally verify at least this very first point before applying it to their model.
If you do not have anything solid to reply to this statements apart "is written inside their paper", than we have really nothing more to discuss.