10KW LENR demonstrator (new thread)

[Axil]

LENR from light in a nutshell

In a polariton based hot spot, the electrons are part of a dipole where the hole makes the electron a boson. Therefore unlimited numbers of electrons can populate a hot spot. The Pauli Exclusion Principle does not apply to the Hot Spot.


The electrons combine with light and lose weight. They can weight as little as 20 mille electron volts. These low mass polaritons will become entangled and form a high temperature polariton Bose Einstein condensate (BEC).


Sometimes when the Hot spot becomes mobile and forms a "polariton bullet", these boson connected electrons lose their holes and the electrons leave the hotspot repelled by the Coulomb force. Only light remains and this light based soliton spin structure may have been observed in many LENR experiments as monopoles.


As I posted elsewhere, the magnetic field of this monopole comes from a POINT in the center of an EMF current ring making it extremely concentrated and very powerful. This energy focusing(10 to the 16th power tesla) is what enables energy levels to reach high enough magnetic power levels for nuclear disruption to occur.

[Asterix]

As I posted elsewhere, the magnetic field of this monopole comes from a POINT in the center of an EMF current ring making it extremely concentrated and very powerful. This energy focusing(10 to the 16th power tesla) is what enables energy levels to reach high enough magnetic power levels for nuclear disruption to occur.

Seems to me that it was stated that the field was 1.6T at a distance of 20 cm. How do you explain the shielding on such a strong field so far from the "center of action"--and why anyone in that room survived the multitudinous flying bits of metal that didn't happen?

[Axil]

As I posted elsewhere, the magnetic field of this monopole comes from a POINT in the center of an EMF current ring making it extremely concentrated and very powerful. This energy focusing(10 to the 16th power tesla) is what enables energy levels to reach high enough magnetic power levels for nuclear disruption to occur.

Seems to me that it was stated that the field was 1.6T at a distance of 20 cm. How do you explain the shielding on such a strong field so far from the "center of action"--and why anyone in that room survived the multitudinous flying bits of metal that didn't happen?

Magnet man demonstrates a super powerful 3 tesla magnet. How did he ever survive all the flying metal?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR_8f0DYK5s

[ScottL]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BBx8BwLhqg

Axil, you're on drugs my friend. Here's what really happens when you mess with a strong magnet.

[Axil]

Consistent with the inverse square law, what those two afore viewed videos show is that strong localized nano-magnetic fields have little effect outside in the macro neighborhood of the area of the field’s influence. However, macro generalized magnetic fields will strongly affect its immediate macro neighborhood.

[Axil]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 142209.htm

Spintronics: Nano Magnets Arise at 2-D Boundaries

Those 2-D Boundaries are also call topological defects in the physics game.


Relevant to our collective interest, LENR also lives in a two dimensional flat world.

Whenever an electromagnetic wave encounters a topological defect, that wave experiences dispersion in a lensing effect. Dispersion is most often described for light waves, but it may occur for any kind of wave that interacts with a medium or passes through an inhomogeneous geometry.

The lens is based on dispersion. When Light enters glass it slows down in the glass; when it leaves, it speeds up.

More generally, "waveguide" dispersion can occur for waves propagating through any inhomogeneous structure (e.g., a photonic crystal).

Dispersion of a wave can be very large. A wave who is traveling in a medium can undergo total internal reflection at its boundary because when the wave strikes it at an angle greater than the so-called critical angle.

This highly bent wave is called an evanescent wave. This type of wave bends in on itself… head to tail… and forms a vortex. In this special case, wave energy entering this vortex and cannot escape. The energy content of the vortex grows very large over time as energy enters the vortex but does not come out. In Nanoplasmonics, this black hole type of behavior is termed "Dark Mode" energy absorption.

Nanoparticle boundaries filed with dielectric pressurized hydrogen support evanescent wave formation at those boundaries.



These vortexes will stabilize due to a self-focusing effect of FANO resonance where the wave will interfere with itself and resonate at an ideal integer (AKA quantum) frequency under the influence of dispersion. This frequency may grow to become very large and powerful (X-Ray).

Any EM wave that travels in a circle will project a magnetic force vector perpendicular to the plain of rotation.

That magnetic field will be highly focused at the dead center of the vortex in a fantastically small region of space. The entire energy content of the wave is concentrated in a point. That concentration mechanism will make the power of the magnetic field very large.

LENR is an energy concentration process where magnetic power is amplified to such a high level that it distorts both the vacuum and matter to the point of disruption.

By the way, a vortex of EM energy can form inside a superconductor, can stabilize, and can persist FOREVER as a condensate because of the superfluidity property of superconductivity. This is type of energy condensation is called matter.



The HIGGS field is a superconductor. Certain types of EM vortex that forms inside the HIGGS field will persist forever as a particle of mass until that vortex is disrupted.

I believe that a strong enough anapole magnetic field can create or destroy matter in the Higgs field since the HIGGS field is in it simplest explanation in part, a magnetic field.

[Asterix]

...and of course, all of those fields were measured at a distance of 20 cm. from the source---not

It seems there's confusion with real magnetic fields acting at macroscopic distances and localized magnetic perturbations.

I have a suggestion for you. Go find a magnetic source (it may well be superconducting) that generates a 1.6T field at a distance of 20 cm. Take your laptop or notebook computer within 50 cm. of that and report back on how well you and it survived.

[Axil]

...and of course, all of those fields were measured at a distance of 20 cm. from the source---not

It seems there's confusion with real magnetic fields acting at macroscopic distances and localized magnetic perturbations.

I have a suggestion for you. Go find a magnetic source (it may well be superconducting) that generates a 1.6T field at a distance of 20 cm. Take your laptop or notebook computer within 50 cm. of that and report back on how well you and it survived.

Thanks:

Any time current flows through a wire, a magnetic field is generated. If that current is a Direct Current, then the resultant magnetic field must have a constant orientation. If the current is alternating current, the magnetic field will vary both in direction and intensity; hence, the term AC magnetic field. This is also known as radio frequency radiation. The magnetic field can vary in frequency from Extremely Low Frequency all the way up to Extremely High Frequency.

The dc magnetic field will be constant. The polarity of the ac field will alternate.

DC Magnetic Field: DC Magnetic Fields can originate from natural or artificial sources. The magnet has a DC field. DC or "static" lines of magnetic flux naturally emanate from the earth or a magnet and provide a compass with the ability to indicate "Magnetic North". A superconducting MRI produces a DC magnetic field.

A DC field can vary if it increases or decreases in intensity. This change in field intensity will disrupt electronic equipment.

An Ac magnetic field will change its polarity from north to/from south at a frequency.

Much can be learned about the LENR reaction by characterizing the magnetic field coming from the Ni/H reactor.

Does the field coming from a coherent source and/or a superconductive source (I.E a Bose-Einstein condensate)?

How does the magnetic field ramp up and down over time?

I believe that my Nanoplasmonic theory predicts a DC magnetic field that may vary in a complex way as solitons are created and destroyed.

This rate of creation/destruction may be reflected in the character of the magnetic field.

If the solitons point in random directions, the LENR field will demonstrate complex interference behavior. An simple Ac field would be bad for my theory.

If the magnetic field produced by LENR is an AC field, it will be oscillating at the frequency of infrared light.

If the magnetic field is disrupting electron equipment and the phone system as stated by Defkalion, it must be varying. Defkalion should put a coil antenna on a high frequency oscilloscope and look at the current that the changing magnetic field produces over time if a field flux change exists.

[Axil]

An interesting experiment.

This experiment will not producing any LENR effects, but it is still a good illustration of principle..

Laser beam fooused on - "a target that consisted of fine nickel hairs just
55nm wide and up to five micrometers long. The spacing between the hairs
was on the order of 130nm

[....]

They found that the typical target had so many electrons ripped away (26
in total) that the nickel atom was left with just two electrons (like
helium). When they tried the same experiments with gold, they were able to
remove 52 of gold's 79 electrons, which is a very large number."

Immense electric fields must have been generated.

References:

Hairy metal laser show produces bright X-Rays

-- Setting metallic wires on fire creates a bright X-Ray glow

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/11/ ... ht-x-rays/




Plasma from "hairy" target releases high-energy x rays

http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/ma ... -pick-post


When high pressure hydrogen(or water) is included in this type of Nanoplasmonic experiment, evanescent waves are produced. These waves confine light, electrons and holes on the surface of the nanowires.

For your convenience as follows:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_wave

An evanescent wave confines the Electromagnetic plasma most intensely at the surface of the nanowire at a distance of 1/3 wavelengths of the irradiating light. The wave’s intensity decays exponentially without absorption as a function of the distance from the boundary at which the wave was formed. Evanescent waves are a general property of the wave-equations of light and electrons.

These evanescent waves are a plasma localization mechanism that act just like the magnetic fields in a tokomak.

As energy is pumped into the nanowire it cannot escape. The energy of the electrons and light grows based on positive feedback.

The incoming radiation strengthens the evanescent waves and these waves drive the electrons and light closer to the surface of the nanowire. The energy is caught in a positive feedback loop as the light and electrons produce shorter and shorter light and electron wavelengths: More incoming energy produces more confinement and more confinement allows more energy storage.

The extreme curvature at the tips of the nanowire will produce a vortex current of light and electrons. These vortex currents will also appear on any rough spots on the wire.

It is this dielectric confinement (aka dark mode) of light and elections produced by pressurized hydrogen that will gnerate extreme levels of EMF power and associated LENR reactions.

Here is some more data on the experiment:

http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v ... 3.217.html

We obtained extraordinarily high degrees of ionization (for example, 52 times ionized Au) and gigabar pressures only exceeded in the central hot spot of highly compressed thermonuclear fusion plasmas. Scaling to higher laser intensities promises to create plasmas with temperatures and pressures approaching those in the centre of the Sun.

Remember, this power was produced without hydrogen and the associated evanescent waves.

[Axil]

There have been indications from research in superconductivity that charge, spin, an angular momentum may be separated from the electron and that the law of conservation of charge is often violated in these types of systems.

This new experiment shows that the properties of quantum particles can be separated in time and space using weak observations and such disembodied quantum properties are an inherent mechanism of quantum mechanics.

Given all the weird things that can occur in quantum mechanics—from entanglement to superposition to teleportation—not much seems surprising in the quantum world. Nevertheless, a new finding that an object's physical properties can be disembodied from the object itself is not something we're used to seeing on an everyday basis. In a new paper, physicists have theoretically shown that this phenomenon, which they call a quantum Cheshire Cat, is an inherent feature of quantum mechanics and could prove useful for performing precise quantum measurements by removing unwanted properties.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-11-physicists ... s.html#jCp


In thinking about LENR, we must guard against narrow thinking which treats quantum particles like billiard balls. For example, charge (aka the coulomb barrier) may be reduced (as in the fractional quantum hall effect) or totally removed from protons if the nucleus of the atom is properly manipulated.

[Axil]

Regarding:

“Cold Nuclear Fusion” at RASA

http://coldfusionnow.org/cold-nuclear-fusion-at-rasa/


Any competent nuclear engineer knows that fusion is a very poor way to get nuclear binding energy out of the nucleus of light elements. At best, fusion provides only a few million electron volts (MeV) of nuclear energy compared to 200 MeV from the fission of heavy elements for each nuclear reaction.

The operative principles of LENR functionality are solely topological and many metals will support this design paradigm.


For example, fission of tungsten has been demonstrated by the high school reactor whose developers claim a COP of 4.

Tungsten is an ideal LENR reactor material with a melting point of 3422 °C.

High thermodynamic efficiency (80 to 90%) can be extracted from a tungsten based reactor heat cycle.

http://www.periodictable.com/Elements/074/data.html

Tungsten is paramagnetic which means that a good LENR metal must be magnetically insensitive either naturally or through the application of high heat at startup in excess of its curie point.


Thorium is also a good host for the LENR reaction with a LENR profile similar to tungsten.

http://periodictable.com/Elements/090/data.html


It is likely that more fission energy can be extracted from thorium fission as compared to the fission energy produced by tungsten because the thorium nucleus is substantially heavier than tungsten whose larger nucleus is more prone to fission.


Furthermore, LENR of thorium and uranium has been demonstrated in Nanoplasmonic experiments using both spark/exploding foil and laser light stimulation.


The traditional nuclear engineering community has rejected fusion as a viable energy source because of its poor energy production profile.


The poor energy production profile is the main reason why fusion is paid slight lip service by professional nuclear experts. Most of these experts direct the conversation to a fission/fusion hybrid end product if pressed to discuss fusion.


And yet the conversation about LENR is focused on fusion exclusively. Anyone who talks fusion is doing a disservice to the proper development of LENR’s full potential.


Without a doubt, the eventual winner in the long term LENR reactor wars to come will use tungsten and/or thorium as its nanoparticle host metal and boiling lithium in phase transition as its coolant; all done in an industrial and/or utility setting.

[Axil]

Italian company to sell portable cold fusion plant deliverable next year

The portable plants are expected to be ready for delivery in approximately four months, which should end the mystery. If Rossi has succeeded where so many others have failed, he and his colleagues will be cheered and likely awarded a Nobel Prize. If the debut is a flop, however, it will be more than just an embarrassment to him and his company, it will be a very sad day for science and perhaps another indication that cold fusion, simply cannot be done.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-11-italian-co ... n.html#jCp

The ECAT 1MW plant is now available on the market

http://ecat.com/ecat-products/ecat-1-mw

[TallDave]

Italian company to sell portable cold fusion plant deliverable next year

The portable plants are expected to be ready for delivery in approximately four months, which should end the mystery. If Rossi has succeeded where so many others have failed, he and his colleagues will be cheered and likely awarded a Nobel Prize. If the debut is a flop, however, it will be more than just an embarrassment to him and his company, it will be a very sad day for science and perhaps another indication that cold fusion, simply cannot be done.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-11-italian-co ... n.html#jCp
The ECAT 1MW plant is now available on the market
http://ecat.com/ecat-products/ecat-1-mw

Well, then.

[TallDave]

Did PhysOrg take the article down?

[Betruger]

... so can we look inside that black box yet?