New glass, ductile and stronger than steel

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

New glass, ductile and stronger than steel

Post by icarus »

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases ... ops-steel/

Makes one wonder about the transparent vacuum vessels of the future glowing with weird and wonderfully coloured plasmas ....

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Re: New glass, ductile and stronger than steel

Post by djolds1 »

icarus wrote:http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases ... ops-steel/

Makes one wonder about the transparent vacuum vessels of the future glowing with weird and wonderfully coloured plasmas ....
Amorphous metals aren't quite "glass" in the commonly understood sense. :D But they are wonderful for 3D printing - easy to inkjet-extrude, useful as bulk structural members.
Vae Victis

DeltaV
Posts: 2245
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am

Re: New glass, ductile and stronger than steel

Post by DeltaV »

djolds1 wrote:But they are wonderful for 3D printing - easy to inkjet-extrude, useful as bulk structural members.
Cool, I can 3D print my Polywell space hopper. Got a reference?

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Re: New glass, ductile and stronger than steel

Post by djolds1 »

DeltaV wrote:
djolds1 wrote:But they are wonderful for 3D printing - easy to inkjet-extrude, useful as bulk structural members.
Cool, I can 3D print my Polywell space hopper. Got a reference?
No, just some reading from a few years back that amorphous metals can be extruded at low temperatures, and the obvious personal extrapolation that such properties are perfect for 3D printing. Might've been from Brian Wang's NBF.
Vae Victis

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

I really hate it that they keep calling this stuff "glass". It is amorphous metal. Grumble, grumble.

krenshala
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Austin, TX, NorAm, Sol III

Post by krenshala »

KitemanSA wrote:I really hate it that they keep calling this stuff "glass". It is amorphous metal. Grumble, grumble.
Glass is an amorphous silicate, and this appears to be an amorphous silicate with multiple metals in it, so technically I think it can be properly referred to as a glass.

Of course, the counter to that argument is silicon doesn't appear to be the primary ingredient, at least not according to the article.

GIThruster
Posts: 4686
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm

Post by GIThruster »

Old stuff, Peeps. This stuff was pioneered at Cal Tech more than a decade ago and is already in the consumer market, in things like skis. Berekely is just publishing to play CMA since they haven't got shtick.

Old, old news.

http://www.liquidmetal.com/

Only real difference I can see is the new stuff is ductile whereas the stuff in consumption is injection molded and not marketed as "ductile".
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis

kcdodd
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX

Post by kcdodd »

I think it is funny the research you choose to dismiss, considering the research you defend.
Last edited by kcdodd on Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Carter

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

krenshala wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:I really hate it that they keep calling this stuff "glass". It is amorphous metal. Grumble, grumble.
Glass is an amorphous silicate, and this appears to be an amorphous silicate with multiple metals in it, so technically I think it can be properly referred to as a glass.
I didn't delve too deeply, but this seems to be amorphous metal with metalic silicon, not silicate. But...

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by choff »

To the layman, if you can see through it, it's glass or transparent plastic.
CHoff

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

I think it is funny the research you choose to dismiss, considering the research you defend.
Quite, it may be the difference of perspective between a lowly "technician" sweating on the front-line of cutting edge research and a mere parasitical broker of "technologies", real or imagined. Ductile glass is ho-hum "schtick" out of Caltech and warp drive research is all-there but for some much needed funding pies to stick fingers thumbs into ...

Delusions of grandeur must do odd things to a person's logical thought processes.

happyjack27
Posts: 1439
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm

Post by happyjack27 »

didn't they invent something like this in one of the star trek movies to keep a whale in the transporter room?

djolds1
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am

Post by djolds1 »

happyjack27 wrote:didn't they invent something like this in one of the star trek movies to keep a whale in the transporter room?
Transparent aluminum.
Vae Victis

kunkmiester
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:51 pm
Contact:

Post by kunkmiester »

We already have transparent aluminum too. Not sure it's one of these funky materials, but I remember reading about it a few years back.
Evil is evil, no matter how small

Giorgio
Posts: 3066
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Post by Giorgio »

GIThruster wrote:Only real difference I can see is the new stuff is ductile whereas the stuff in consumption is injection molded and not marketed as "ductile".
Right... what diference can this make?
Kinda like when in 1400 they discovered that Iron could be transformed in ductile Steel. Old news also that one and it really didn't make any difference in the end, didn't it? :roll:

Post Reply