Talk-Polywell.org

Axil wrote:Rossi: “they are either competitors, sometimes disguised as Research Laboratories anxious to validate, sent by the same”

… stupidities of a snake…

… fake journalists…

Is this Steve Krivit?

Sent by Competitors…

Can this be a reference to Piantelli?


I am just chattering…

Mr “Godbole” :
I know perfectly who you are and with whom you are working and trying to copy my process. Your is just an attempt of espionage.
Safety issues have been treated by us with the proper experts of the field and institutions, which have certified that we have no emissions. If you want to obtain a working apparatus, instead of the ridiculous scrap you made up to now, work more and talk less.
In two and a half years of tests we made every day with our E-Cats, no radiations above the law limits have beed detected outside the E-Cats, no radioactive wastes have been left, no radioactive materials have been used. We have huge certification about this issue, made not by assholes, who speak of safety without knowledge of the matter, but by experts who every day go where are radioactive emissions ( for example hospitals) to check that the law is respected. This is the people we are working with. You are just trying to blackmail us, but, sincerely, you are a paper tiger. And, by the way: your “group” has said repeatedly that my process is not good, that there are no nuclear reactions: now you sustain that my process is dangerous for the radiations…don’t you think here is a slight contradiction? Again: go to work and talk less, mr “Godbole”, or whatever you are really.
Regards,
Andrea Rossi

V. Godbole
June 1st, 2011 at 5:21 AM
Safe is to reveal what catalyst and how the catalyst works and how the device works.
You already have the patent.
Nothing is 100% secure or garanteed in life on the earth.

Science and theory need to know, free information is a must. Only then there is progress. You will need governments and govt. agencies to prevent the device from being misused.

parallel wrote:Possible to be 100% dry but unlikely.
The dryness fraction from, say, a simple water tube boiler would be about .95 due to droplets being carried over. That's only < 5% loss in total heat though.

Dear Daniel,

I was very nice to meet you this week and I enjoyed your company. I do not Understand why you have posted a message from Levi That contains a direct falsehood.

Levi Stated That I Had In His letter omitted in Crucial Fact, That if His measurements HAD Been done by mass, the Enthalpy That Would Have Been Reduced in a linear way.

In my post: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/ ... -and-levi/
Specifically Mentioned That The Fact: "Because a measurement by mass has a linear effect on the output Enthalpy ..."

My full report, to be published in A Few weeks from now, will shed much light on many of the Matters Discussed on this page.

Sincerely,
Steven B.Krivit

***

Dear Steven,

I was pleased to meet you in Bologna too. However, I was very surprised when i read your So Called preliminary report. I'm just a blogger, while you are a journalist instead.But Appears to Be your preliminary report written by a blogger just like me.I'm sorry, but this is my opinion.

You drew the attention on insignificant details like the tire shop and a coffee machine!

You've fabricated an "E-Cat trio" that does not exist! There is an inventor, His consultant (who is a famous retired Professor) and a PhD; Each have individual Their Own role: to mix together Them is a mistake.

You've omitted to Crucial Fact: the answer to your question by the professor at the university who is an expert on steam (Zanchini). Why?

I really hope That your full report will unwrap the truth on many of the Matters Discussed on this page.

Dear greetings
Daniel Passerini

MSimon wrote:

parallel wrote:Possible to be 100% dry but unlikely.
The dryness fraction from, say, a simple water tube boiler would be about .95 due to droplets being carried over. That's only < 5% loss in total heat though.

Is that with or without a steam drier?

Kahuna wrote:...I do not Understand why you have posted a message from Levi That contains a direct falsehood.

Levi Stated That I Had In His letter omitted in Crucial Fact, That if His measurements HAD Been done by mass, ...

Joseph Chikva wrote:I am repeating one more time
Three people: engineer together with two having academic degrees consultants could not provide doubtless data in the simplest situation.
Here only remains to discuss conspiracy theories with which people here are engaged with a great success.

dch24 wrote:Joseph, welcome and thanks for contributing.

Although it does seem strange at first, I've seen stranger and it hasn't turned out to be a conspiracy. There's a quote you see often on the internet, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." (Robert J. Hanlon)

As an aside, I've read every post on this thread. Wow, what a journey!

Kahuna wrote:
In the context of the comment, Steve Krivit is almost certainly the "snake" to which he refers (far from the Rossi apologist that some here had forecast).

Ivy Matt wrote:what is Rossi going on about in this comment? I assume "Mr 'Godbole'" is Vasudev Godbole, apparently a cold fusion theorist, but Rossi seems to think he is someone hiding under a pseudonym. And does anyone know what "group" Rossi is referring to?

Mr “Godbole” :
I know perfectly who you are and with whom you are working and trying to copy my process. Your is just an attempt of espionage.

KitemanSA wrote:Shame on you all. If you have FACTS, present them.