AcesHigh wrote:isnt it funny how usually we think as childish of people who strongly disagree with us?Diogenes wrote:AcesHigh wrote:
says the most childish person on these forums.
You bear that distinction in my mind. Since your very first message, I thought of you as an idiot, and you have done little to convince me otherwise since.
I don't mind people disagreeing with me. If they have facts to back up their argument, I will look at their evidence. If it is convincing, I will change my opinion and conclude I have learned something.
It is those people who espouse out of ignorance, and base their decisions on faulty assumptions or lack of knowledge for which I have no use. They do us all a disservice by creating an ocean of polluted facts with which to confuse the more ignorant folk.
AcesHigh wrote: and of course you will defend GIThruster. It seems you agree with him in most matters. I would never expect you to find his attitudes childish. Expecting such thing from you, now, THAT would be childish.
I am keeping an open mind. I am not so convinced of some of the conclusions he has put forth as is he, but I am willing to consider the possibility that some of what he says may be correct.
Now if YOU had said the same thing, I would dismiss it all as a kookery, because I already have a predisposition to not take what you write seriously. HIM I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
There may be something to it, but the evidence I have seen so far does not justify such extensive conclusions, but I am willing to listen and see further evidence. I would prefer that a discussion regarding UFOs be on a separate thread in General, rather than in conjunction with a thread discussing the Mach effect thruster.