alexjrgreen wrote:More theoretical support:
Negative-Mass Hydrodynamics in a Spin-Orbit–Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate
Appears to be negative effective mass, not gravitational mass. No warp drive yet, but a cool effect all the same.
alexjrgreen wrote:More theoretical support:
Negative-Mass Hydrodynamics in a Spin-Orbit–Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate
TDPerk wrote:https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=31037.msg1722952#msg1722952
Little drips of info.
I have yet to understand how Woodward and Fearn's work is so neglected when it is so well done and gives expiremtnal results consistent with ME theory.
Skipjack wrote:Heidi Fearn of SSI will be speaking about the Mach Effect work they have been doing with the NIAC grant they received in about 30 minutes from now.
https://livestream.com/viewnow/NIAC2017
kunkmiester wrote:Sadly most people won't be convinced until you land a 747 in their front yard. Also sadly, that would be rather expensive.
ScottL wrote:kunkmiester wrote:Sadly most people won't be convinced until you land a 747 in their front yard. Also sadly, that would be rather expensive.
You can't really claim thrust that is on the edge of your equipment's ability to measure and call it a success. People should still be skeptical at this point. Whether optimistically skeptical, well that is up to the reader, but we should all remain skeptical. Until some form of undeniable evidence is brought forth, it is the logical and prudent position to take. That being said, I hope they do have something, but I'll wait until they have something more to show.
ladajo wrote:Is that Rossiclown Sigmas, or real science sigma?
![]()
![]()
![]()
TDPerk wrote:Their equipment is good for 6 sigma at the observed signal level.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests