mvanwink5 wrote:johanfprins, congratulations on getting support, we will all benefit from your success. I read your posts with great interest and think that you have good understanding of fundamental issues that standard views are in error on.
Thank you; I appreciate your support.
I have read the thread and do not find it surprising at all: However, it is my opinion that the “particle” physicists do not yet understand what a neutrino really is. I believe that a full understanding will only come once the physics community agree that the Standard Model of “Particle” Physics is deeply flawed. It is my hope that the search for the so-called Higgs' boson will finally convince them that a totally new approach is required: Just a pity that it has cost the world billions of dollars to get to this point.
Thus to get away from the standard model, I would like to reframe you question in a more general context as follows: "Can light-energy or mass-energy (which I believe is in essence the same energy) relocate from one position in space to another position in space so that the time interval during which this happens is so short that the relocation is faster than it would have been if it occurred at light speed?" On this question I can write a book: However, I will try to summarise my conclusions in this posting.
My conclusion: Such relocation is occurring all the time right in front of our eyes; but we have been blinkered from observing it by paranormal physics concepts like “wave-particle duality” and “probability waves”, which after 1927 steered that part of physics, which is solidly based on these concepts, into becoming metaphysics. In the case of Chemistry and Solid State Physics, the use of Schroedinger’s equation did not require that the Copenhagen interpretation must be correct. One could just “shut-up and calculate”. It is thus not surprising that the major successes of quantum physics have been in Chemistry and Solid State Physics. In Quantum Electrodynamics and The Standard Model of “Particle” Physics, the Copenhagen interpretation is essential; and therefore I believe that the latter theories and models will collapse: And the sooner the better for humankind.
It is, for example, ludicrous to conclude that when you observe electrons they act differently than when you do not observe them and therefore your mind affects reality; or that we are generating new near-identical universes all the time; or that what we do now, affects the past, etc. etc. etc.
Once you accept that matter and light consist only as waves, and that the intensity of a light wave is its energy (which for a free light wave is purely kinetic since such a light wave always moves with a speed c relative to any inertial reference frame) and that the intensity of a free matter wave is its mass-plus-gravitational energy (which in this case is not purely kinetic since mass-energy must be stationary within one of all the possible inertial reference frames), then paranormal physics disappears.
It has been known for thousands of years that waves move with a speed which is determined by a stationary substance within which the wave moves and that if you move with the wave the wave will be observed as being stationary. The latter is not the case for light waves and therefore Einstein quite correctly concluded that a stationary ether does not exist for these wave. A matter wave can be observed as being stationary within its own special inertial reference frame and it only moves relative to an observer when it is observed from another inertial reference frame moving relative to the inertial reference frame within which the matter wave is stationary. Thus, the speed with which it moves is determined by the speed of the observer relative to the reference frame within which the matter wave is stationary. The “ether” of a matter wave is thus a “relativistic substance”. I do not want to expand on these aspects too much, or else my post will become a book.
What is important to note is that the shape and size of a wave is determined by the boundary conditions under which the wave finds itself. When you change the boundary conditions the wave must morph. In most cases when you do a measurement, you change the boundary conditions, and the wave must then morph; and if the measurement is an instantaneous measurement, the wave must morph instantaneously. Thus when a matter-wave is spread over a large volume in space so that its energy is distributed within this volume, and you change its boundary conditions instantaneously so that it must occupy a far smaller volume, its distributed mass energy must collapse instantaneously into this smaller volume. Obviously this means that energy is relocating in space at a speed that exceeds the speed of light. Alternatively, a measurement can require a localised wave to spread out instantaneously into a much larger volume, and this also requires the relocation of energy (light or mass) at a speed faster than the speed of light. It is probably the latter effect which caused the rapid inflation (as deduced by Guth) of our universe just after the “Big Bang”.
The superconducting phase that I have discovered 10 years ago while extracting electrons from an n-type diamond by means of an anode throws further light on this faster than light speed interactions. The extracted electrons form a single macro-wave by total entanglement of the electrons. After this has happened, there are no separate “electron-particles” within this wave. Thus, the wave does not have charge-carriers which can move through it to convey a current: Yet, it does transfer a current: Why? The reason is that the macro-wave is the lowest-energy macro-wave that can form subject to the boundary conditions (as defined by the diamond substrate and the anode). When you now inject an electron from the diamond (or the anode) into this macro-wave, the energy of the wave increases: It should thus break up. But wave-mechanics come to the rescue. The energy of a matter wave can gain energy (delta)E as long as it is not for longer than a time (delta)t. Where does this energy come from? According to Quantum Electrodynamics it comes from the “vacuum”. I agree that it comes from a fourth dimension, but it is not “the vacuum” since the amplitude of a matter waves is a complex function which automatically requires an extra dimension to “live in”.
But to make a long story short: the fact is that when you inject an electron into the superconducting phase which I have discovered 10 years ago, the gain in energy (delta)E must be shed within a time (delta)t: Thus within this time interval an electron has to be ejected at the other contact. Note that this happens without an electron actually moving from one contact to the other. The injected electron disappears at the injection contact and “re-appears” at the ejection contact. One can thus describe the transfer of the electron as teleportation (beam me up Scotty). Now if the time (delta)t is shorter than the time it will require an electron to move from one contact to another at the speed of light, it means that an electron has relocated from the injection contact to the ejection contact at a rate that is higher than the speed of light.
Just imagine what one will have if one develops a processor chip within which the charge-carriers can “teleport” faster than the speed of light, and in addition do not generate heat within the processor chip. This is what I have been able to offer to humankind over the past 10 years: But nobody wants to listen since, notwithstanding having had a successful career in diamond physics, I have, according to the “experts” on superconduction, suddenly turned into a crackpot.