Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:14 pm
Done!I recommend all do the same when they check it.
Talk-Polywell.org
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
Page 4 of 122
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:49 pm
I got a response!
_________
Thank you for contacting Recovery.gov. It appears that the Recipient did not report and should have because the project wasn’t completed yet. We are looking into this issue.
Thank you,
----------------------------------------------------
Recovery.gov Webteam
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board
______________
Interesting!
_________
Thank you for contacting Recovery.gov. It appears that the Recipient did not report and should have because the project wasn’t completed yet. We are looking into this issue.
Thank you,
----------------------------------------------------
Recovery.gov Webteam
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board
______________
Interesting!
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:36 am
This does not give me a warm fuzzy.
They are playing with fire.
Hopefully (and I think more likely) there is not much to this.
They filed, and goofed it, or it was late, or something. Maybe Rick was busy with initial power ups
They are playing with fire.
Hopefully (and I think more likely) there is not much to this.
They filed, and goofed it, or it was late, or something. Maybe Rick was busy with initial power ups
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:33 am
I agree, is not a good indicator.
I was also monitoring the late reporters lists, but they have not yet been updated with the late reporters for the past quarter.
Than there is also the list of the contracts that do not have to report at all, but for now it looks like is limited to those contracts under 50K US$ grant.
I was also monitoring the late reporters lists, but they have not yet been updated with the late reporters for the past quarter.
Than there is also the list of the contracts that do not have to report at all, but for now it looks like is limited to those contracts under 50K US$ grant.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:48 pm
Maybe someone should ping Dr. N. via the EMC2FDC web site.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:41 pm
Surely it'll boil any minute now.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:38 pm
nice. very apt.Betruger wrote:Surely it'll boil any minute now.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:45 pm
Don't know what to say. Doesn't look good.
Completely out of character for Dr. Nebel, from what we know so far. I will give him the benefit of the doubt. There is doubt though.
Completely out of character for Dr. Nebel, from what we know so far. I will give him the benefit of the doubt. There is doubt though.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:51 pm
Nothing to see here folks!
Move along quickly now please!
Move along quickly now please!
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:29 pm
I thought they were late posting last time also??? 
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:11 am
Don't think so. We were late finding it. And we (ok, I) expected it earlier; internet instant service and all!ltgbrown wrote:I thought they were late posting last time also???
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:32 am
OK, so it's gone beyond China Lake, beyond Area 51, beyond the underwater base off the African coast. It must now be located at the Luna farside facility.
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 am
They sure to be experts in one thing by now at least .... moving the lab, seem to spend a lot of time shifting around.
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:25 am
The (D-D) neutron counts keep going higher and higher... Luna is the best place to avoid injury lawsuits AND keep the Deep Black options open.
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:24 am
Aww Geez. We snitched.ltgbrown wrote:I got a response!
_________
Thank you for contacting Recovery.gov. It appears that the Recipient did not report and should have because the project wasn’t completed yet. We are looking into this issue.
Thank you,
----------------------------------------------------
Recovery.gov Webteam
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board
______________
Interesting!