Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

As Principal Grinch here, even I would say it says very little.

If one were to really want to stretch out the infinitely thin, then perhaps you might posit that the experiment has gone beyond 'theory' and it is now an experiment dominated by experimental observations. Theorising can only do so much, and if you get to the point where it is behaving in a way [or not!!] where theory no longer helps comprehension, then it is like the good ol' days of science - get some bl**dy results first before powerpointing new inventions out of thin air!!!!

Helius
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Syracuse, New York

Pollywell Marries Cold fusion.

Post by Helius »

Maybe Park is blowing Ni dust into the core of the machine. Would it load with protons?

At any rate, it' *is* a wierd machine, lots of ports, and they're most likely getting information never before seen. We're one dimensional, thinking "scaling", whereas they're getting "nuanced" results.

I'm no longer interested in "Scaling", because if it scaled as expected (hoped), then I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be able to peel Nebel off the thing.

rcain
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Contact:

Post by rcain »

all this rumour making me a bit edgy.

is there any way we can definitively ascertain:

a) whether Polywell project is canned (or still carrying on in its usual silent manner)
b) whether Rick Nebel is still on the project (or not).

Anyone tried to contact him lately to find out?

DeltaV
Posts: 2245
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am

Post by DeltaV »

If he is now a consultant, vs. a federal employee, that gives him much more latitude to negotiate commercial teaming arrangements.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

Well, I guess you will all have to revise your opinions of why and how Rick Nebel is no longer associated with EMC2.

The 1Q/2011 recovery.gov report states:

"As of 1Q/2011, the WB-8 device operates as designed and it is generating positive results. EMC2 is planning to conduct comprehensive experiments on WB-8 in the next 9-12 months based on the current contract funding schedule."

I make of this that they ARE behind schedule, and have NOT received all funding from the Recovery Act, and that we WILL see another report.

I also am failing to supress an uncontrolled expression of glee. :D

Ivy Matt
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am

Post by Ivy Matt »

"Positive results". That sounds...positive. Not being a scientist, though, I'm not entirely sure what that means. Does it mean, "results are meeting, nearly meeting, or exceeding our expectations", or does it just mean, "we're learning new things" (which, granted, is much better than nothing)?

I would have interpreted "based on the current contract funding schedule" to mean that they're still on schedule, and will be going forward with WB-8.1 from October this year to October 2012, but I grant that the wording doesn't specifically say that. Does it mean that they'll be dipping into the WB-8.1 funds in order to continue experimentation with WB-8?

More Recovery.gov reports are always welcome, but it looks like it may be a while yet before the public hears anything specific. :?

EDIT: I just noticed the "Final Project Report Submitted" status is still "No".
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

I take it as it is written:
WB8 is operating as design, and producing positive results.

That means it is at a minimum meeting expectations as established in the design criteria and performance modeling. So my read is that given they should now have enough data to compare against some level of THEIR models for scaling, it is at least meeting those models.

My read: So far so good, and scaling is being proven.

This is really good news.

Ivy Matt
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am

Post by Ivy Matt »

That would be very good news, at least for a deuterium-fueled WB-D. Not-so-good news for ITER. I wonder how clear evidence of success on the deuterium front would affect the schedule for WB-8.1. I get the feeling EMC2 might want to put it on the back burner in the rush to get out a working WB-D with deuterium fuel. Which would be entirely understandable.

But I'm still curious to hear Chris's (and others') take on this.
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Post by mvanwink5 »

Yea! I see I am not the first to see this, but not the last! I will interpret this in an opposite way to Chris (my favorite Grinch:) ), that WB8 is a success! They still have money in the project for more testing and will continue to test.

"As of 1Q/2011, the WB-8 device operates as designed and it is generating positive results. EMC2 is planning to conduct comprehensive experiments on WB-8 in the next 9-12 months based on the current contract funding schedule."

Cheers!
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6805
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Where is the link to that quote?
Anyway, if it is indeed so, then I will revise my earlier assessment from "I am pretty sure that it failed" back to "I may be dammed if I know" ;)

Ivy Matt
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am

Post by Ivy Matt »

Oh, the link! How thoughtless of us. For all you know we could be discussing the voices we're hearing in our heads. :P Here it is: link
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.

Skipjack
Posts: 6805
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Ok, that is interesting, though does not rally say much. Still, at least we know they are still in the game.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

I think it says a lot. Specifically, WB8 is doing what we thought it would do.
IAW with the contract objectives, that is significant.
The only part that is unclear remains the timeline. 9-12 months testing. that means they are thinking to run it until December to March-ish. Fine by me. That tends to fit with what I have been saying about being behind and its potential ramifications on the timeline.

I will step out on a limb here and say I feel vindicated to some degree. :)

Ivy Matt
Posts: 711
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am

Post by Ivy Matt »

It never does say much. It merely provides fuel for endless speculation on these forums. Still, it's nice to see some progress beyond "project under construction" or "first plasma".

While Chris is still asleep (presumably), I'll steal his thunder and note that we still haven't seen any numbers. Not that I'm optimistic about seeing numbers, at least for some months. I also don't think EMC2 is about to break their silence now, just because they've reached an old and somewhat arbitrary deadline. Ah, well.

Fuel for speculation: assuming EMC2 decides to go ahead and build a 100MW Polywell device in the not-too-distant future, is their current facility in San Diego sufficient for that, or would they have to relocate again? Was WB-D the reason they relocated in the first place? Also, if WB-7 to WB-8 goes well, does that necessarily indicate that WB-8 to WB-D would also go well? (That may be better as a question for the Theory forum.) I assume, but it might bear repeating, that WB-8 is not expected to be a net power device.

I'm about ready to feel optimistic, but this is fusion, after all. :wink:
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.

MSimon
Posts: 14334
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

ladajo wrote:Well, I guess you will all have to revise your opinions of why and how Rick Nebel is no longer associated with EMC2.

The 1Q/2011 recovery.gov report states:

"As of 1Q/2011, the WB-8 device operates as designed and it is generating positive results. EMC2 is planning to conduct comprehensive experiments on WB-8 in the next 9-12 months based on the current contract funding schedule."

I make of this that they ARE behind schedule
, and have NOT received all funding from the Recovery Act, and that we WILL see another report.

I also am failing to supress an uncontrolled expression of glee. :D
I can let the cat out of the bag now. Procurement difficulties rather than experiment gone bad.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Post Reply