Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

KitemanSA
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: OlyPen WA

Post by KitemanSA »

bennmann wrote:Except for Dr. Who, insane optimism might be his appeal and why as an American I love him.
But he is Gallifrean, not Brit.

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Ivy Matt wrote:
Tom Ligon wrote:You might scratch your head wondering what the cattle watering trough is for.
Watering cattle?
Image

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

bennmann wrote:Except for Dr. Who, insane optimism might be his appeal and why as an American I love him.
I think the issue is snarky expressions of the failures of others, and insane optimism about one's own endeavours. Just look how he rubbishes the Daleks/Cybermen superiority! Just think of him and his 'team' as the Brits (which they usually are!), and the automaton make-everyone-in-the-Universe-think-the-same, strength-through-military-superiority Cybermen as the Yankees. I think the parts should fit well, don't you think!? :twisted:

I suspect that this is, actually, just human nature and is manifest on a sliding spectrum. I don't think I am fully at the snarky end, just heading there in the general direction - and getting closer as the years roll on by....!


PNeilson10 wrote:I have been debating taking on a new and hard project myself, here in the USA. I have been uniformly cheered and praised by friends and acquaintances for thinking about taking a chance on a project with a self described 1% chance of success.
Mine is less likely than a one in 10 billion, but it seems a dead cert to me too! (Insane optimism??)

(I'm also universally told that I am not at all as scary to talk to than it seems in writing.)

Go ahead... tell us what your 1% project is and we can test whether I fall on the sarky side or not.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

sad yawn ...

... doesn't take much to get you guys excited these days. A bald one line statement from a govt. bureaucrat in pseudo-corpro speak and your mobility scooters click into overdrive.

If the results are as great as you are all claiming, then there should be an army of competing labs from all around the world investigating how to get this working from a multitude of angles ... its a travesty, this cloistered little group toiling away with a small club of old fan boys sitting outside the walls, cobwebs growing over them .... "any day now we'll hear something about the greatest thing man has ever done"

uh-huh.

Tom Ligon
Posts: 1871
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tom Ligon »

I think I'm prohibited from saying what the watering trough is for, but I think I'm safe in saying it is an indication that they don't squander money if there is a practical and economical alternative, unlike some big government projects.

When I was with EMC2, a couple of our biggest scientific equipment suppliers were Home Depot and Vamac Plumbing Supply. We tried shopping at the Black Hole of Los Alamos, but had more luck with a couple of other surplus houses. Dr. Bussard was fascinated by some of the trinkets at American Science and Surplus, although I don't think much of that wound up in practical applications.

But it is hard to avoid spending the money where it counts, in things like vacuum hardware, pumps, and magrids.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Post by mvanwink5 »

Chris, "Mine is less likely than a one in 10 billion, but it seems a dead cert to me too! (Insane optimism??) "

For my own part, I appreciate a mind running in paradox mode, it keeps one sane in this world (only when self aware that one is doing this, most don't!)

Best, cheers!
Mike
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

icarus wrote:If the results are as great as you are all claiming, then there should be an army of competing labs from all around the world investigating how to get this working from a multitude of angles


You might think this should be the way things are, but it isn't - especially in fusion. Labs are fixated on their particular experiments and do not even pause to read up on new approaches. This is the fundamental problem for 21st century science - gravy train ticket financing tends to move folks attention away from 'general innovation'. Go ask any one of those listed in DV's 'fusion race' about the latest developments in the others, and I'd betcha they'd neither know, nor care to know (excepting myself, of course!! :wink: )

I am absolutely convinced that this is a fundamental problem embedded in the way these things are funded. Imagine if EMC2 suddenly dropped polywell to go build a mini tokamak with their budget - y'see, they just CAN'T do that, the basic funding mechanisms just don't allow it to happen. They've drawn up the plan, the gov/VC/whatever funding has been put in place for THAT project, and they don't have a brown dollar left to spend 10 minutes reading about what they think is a different project.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Post by mvanwink5 »

icarus wrote:sad yawn ...

... doesn't take much to get you guys excited these days. A bald one line statement from a govt. bureaucrat in pseudo-corpro speak and your mobility scooters click into overdrive.

If the results are as great as you are all claiming, then there should be an army of competing labs from all around the world investigating how to get this working from a multitude of angles ... its a travesty, this cloistered little group toiling away with a small club of old fan boys sitting outside the walls, cobwebs growing over them .... "any day now we'll hear something about the greatest thing man has ever done"

uh-huh.
That is very funny Icarus, like being a spots fan, no? Difference is most of these guys could actually contribute, unlike myself. I do understand most of what is said and find it more meaningful than sports.

Best,
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

bennmann
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Location: Southeast US

Post by bennmann »

mvanwink5 wrote:
That is very funny Icarus, like being a spots fan, no? Difference is most of these guys could actually contribute, unlike myself. I do understand most of what is said and find it more meaningful than sports.

Best,
I like your simile and endorse it.

choff
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by choff »

Tom Ligon wrote:I think I'm prohibited from saying what the watering trough is for, but I think I'm safe in saying it is an indication that they don't squander money if there is a practical and economical alternative, unlike some big government projects.

When I was with EMC2, a couple of our biggest scientific equipment suppliers were Home Depot and Vamac Plumbing Supply. We tried shopping at the Black Hole of Los Alamos, but had more luck with a couple of other surplus houses. Dr. Bussard was fascinated by some of the trinkets at American Science and Surplus, although I don't think much of that wound up in practical applications.

But it is hard to avoid spending the money where it counts, in things like vacuum hardware, pumps, and magrids.
I vaguely remember an article where RNebel mentioned a water tank in relation to protecting against high voltage arching, something about the cap bank, something learned with previous experimental work, am I lukewarm?
CHoff

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Betruger wrote:It could also be interpreted as (iirc) Chris said. Positive demonstration of useful/useless physics. And one of the alternative reasons for ambiguous wording is specifically to give be as slippery as possible for speculation like this forum's.

IOW another effective deflection of public influence on their work, as probably was the "proprietary" claim in response to FOI request.
Rereading it, it's hard to interpret it as in bold. That would be the part bolded below:
As of 1Q/2011, the WB-8 device operates as designed and it is generating positive results.
Just leaves out how positive.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Post by mvanwink5 »

"operates as designed," would be trivial if thought to mean the vacuum pumps work or the magnets work, or the program controls work, etc. Those things as well as the sun is rising and setting every day are not worth the time to print. We already know from the last report that the machine generates plasma, and we know since WB-7 ran like a top that WB-8, which is based on what was learned there, will also. The idea of the machine operation is to produce fusion with the already known wiffle ball, at voltage, without excessive losses. That is what the design is about. What was to be learned and is worth reporting is, does it scale as expected? That is the only thing that motivated WB-8 work. To say there are positive results means it scales. It does not take 9 - 12 months to know if it scales adequately. 9 - 12 months operation is useful to gather engineering design data and optimization data.

Maybe Simon is busy with WB plans? I would be if I had that skill set, and would find time to post here scarce.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

TallDave
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Drove by EMC^2 today.

Post by TallDave »

pbreed wrote:I live in San Diego and when I'm driving near EMC^2 I sometimes drive around their building. Today the garage door was open.

The following was my impression gotten in a 5 second glance.

About 1/2 the machine was covered in what looked like insulation, or shielding. Whatever it was it was made up of flat panels. Dark brown or black.

1/2 the machine was bare stainless, so I suspect that the other was insulation for the cryogenic parts. They still have the large LN2 Dewar outside.

I saw no sign of any shielding on the doors or on the visible office partition. This means either EMC^2 is not making as many neutrons or are not as careful as the LPP guys that have their machine in a shielded room.

I've been tempted to drive by with a camera and take a picture, but I have been unable to google myself an answer to the question, "if you take a picture from public land into an open door is that considered public or not public?" Any authoritative references on this could induce me to snap a picture next time I'm in the area.
Thanks for sharing! Pictures would definitely be exciting, though as Tom says they won't tell us much that's useful (unless you happen to get a shot of a computer screen with the power and loss scaling given in a 20 point font).

FWIW, Alan Boyle said "Thanks for the tip!" No word on whether an interview will be forthcoming, but I left a couple suggested questions on the off chance...
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Maybe he could at least shed some light on the EMC2/Nebel situation.

Giorgio
Posts: 3061
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: Drove by EMC^2 today.

Post by Giorgio »

TallDave wrote:FWIW, Alan Boyle said "Thanks for the tip!" No word on whether an interview will be forthcoming, but I left a couple suggested questions on the off chance...
That's all?
He was much more cooperative a couple of year ago. I wonder if he knows more than he is allowed to disclose.

Oh man, I am starting to become paranoic too.... :roll:

Post Reply