Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

polywellfan
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm

sad

Post by polywellfan »

I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Post by Stubby »

What are you talking about?

ScottL
Posts: 1122
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: sad

Post by ScottL »

polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
Last edited by ScottL on Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Skipjack
Posts: 6817
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
??

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Nothing looks good for Polywell. The more of it they can get in their system (in a controlled way of course) the better the system is likely to operate.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

tomclarke
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:52 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by tomclarke »

MSimon wrote:Nothing looks good for Polywell. The more of it they can get in their system (in a controlled way of course) the better the system is likely to operate.
"Looking good" (bright purple etc) is not what nothing does, in fact it's what something does.

paperburn1
Posts: 2484
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: sad

Post by paperburn1 »

ScottL wrote:
polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.
all sheer speculation on my part.

ScottL
Posts: 1122
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: sad

Post by ScottL »

paperburn1 wrote:
ScottL wrote:
polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.
all sheer speculation on my part.
Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.

polywellfan
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: sad

Post by polywellfan »

ScottL wrote:
polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
Last time? Wrong EMC?

polywellfan
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: sad

Post by polywellfan »

ScottL wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:
ScottL wrote: Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.
all sheer speculation on my part.
Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.
No. You are mixing something up. Sorry.

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Post by Stubby »

Well then maybe you should explain your comment at the top of this page.


polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.

polywellfan
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: sad

Post by polywellfan »

ScottL wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:
ScottL wrote: Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.
all sheer speculation on my part.
Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.
You mean this post? viewtopic.php?p=82691&highlight=#82691

I said there the entry doesn't fit, that is why I asked here.

You can search for all my post on this forum here. It isn't much.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

So answer the question. Sorry why?
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

polywellfan
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm

Post by polywellfan »

ladajo wrote:So answer the question. Sorry why?
It seems to be this way.

It's the impression I've got from the last comments in this thread.

ScottL
Posts: 1122
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:26 pm

Post by ScottL »

polywellfan wrote:
ladajo wrote:So answer the question. Sorry why?
It seems to be this way.

It's the impression I've got from the last comments in this thread.
So a whole bunch of positive posts = bad news? haha ok.

Post Reply