Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm
sad
I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
-
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
- Location: Third rock from the sun.
Re: sad
8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.ScottL wrote:Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
all sheer speculation on my part.
Re: sad
Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.paperburn1 wrote:8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.ScottL wrote:Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
all sheer speculation on my part.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: sad
Last time? Wrong EMC?ScottL wrote:Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?polywellfan wrote:I am so sad it doesn't seem to look good for polywell.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: sad
No. You are mixing something up. Sorry.ScottL wrote:Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.paperburn1 wrote:8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.ScottL wrote: Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
all sheer speculation on my part.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: sad
You mean this post? viewtopic.php?p=82691&highlight=#82691ScottL wrote:Yeah I'm aware, but last time "PolywellFan" posted, he looked up the wrong EMC and posted about computer upgrade contracts, which of course we corrected and he went silent.paperburn1 wrote:8/23/12 the modified the contract and changed the funding lines by up 1.2 mil dollars. so they got another slug of money and that should pay them for a while. 4.7 mil to be used or that is the amount that would signal WB8.1 unless the 1.2 was a draw on that funding.ScottL wrote: Source? Did you look up the wrong EMC again like last time?
all sheer speculation on my part.
I said there the entry doesn't fit, that is why I asked here.
You can search for all my post on this forum here. It isn't much.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:05 pm