More Piston Fusion

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
PolyGirl
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:16 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

More Piston Fusion

Post by PolyGirl »

More information on Piston fusion can be found at Physorg

Do not worry it will take 10 plus years before anything will come of it (even if it does). A Polywell demo fusion reactor is just a few years away (hopefully).

Regards
Polygirl
The more I know, the less I know.

kurt9
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by kurt9 »

I don't which version of fusion works. I'd be happy if any one of them ends up being successful. Art Carlson and many of the pdf's I've downloaded lately has me somewhat convinced that it will be some variant of the FRC.

EricF
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Pell City, Alabama

Post by EricF »

Does it seem to anyone else that a key advantage to polywell would be far fewer moving parts? All of those pistons are going to wear down through continous use and require more maintainance, would it not? Not to mention the heat buildup and net energy cost of the friction of the pistons involved.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

EricF wrote:Does it seem to anyone else that a key advantage to polywell would be far fewer moving parts? All of those pistons are going to wear down through continous use and require more maintainance, would it not? Not to mention the heat buildup and net energy cost of the friction of the pistons involved.
Yes and yes.

I did a BOE on the reliability of such a system and came up with a MTBF of around 1 year. Probably workable.

Polywell with D-D (neutronic fuel) has a similar MTBF. With Polywell the question is not mechanical wear but neutron damage to the SC magnets.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Post Reply