Recovery.Gov Project Tracker

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Robthebob
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Auburn, Alabama

Post by Robthebob »

ladajo wrote:So we now have a hard target of 30 June, 2012. We also know that they are fully funded per the contract. I will be interesting. Especially to see what happens in regard to the contract options (8.1) still on the table.

I maintain that progress to 8.1 means that 8.0 worked for D-D well enough to justify taking a crack at PB&J. So at that point, the minimum success point is met, D-D is viable.
We went from around the start of fall of 2011 to the start of spring of 2012, now to the start of fall of 2012, you guys......

I dont like to complain, but seriously, wtf.... We've all been following this for like at least 3 years now. I guess the only thing that will calm nerves is for Dr Nebel or Dr Park to come out and say something, only to disappear back into the forest again.
Throwing my life away for this whole Fusion mess.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

I actually think it is encouraging in a sense that FPDS has held the 30 June, 2012 completion target for a relative while now. So, from that point of view, we can expect either movement on money (8.1?) or no movement by probably March, 2012. Given that the 8.0 money is now spent, it means something will have to give. And we should see it give.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2154
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Post by mvanwink5 »

Ladajo,
Thanks for finding those money trail links. At least we have a chance now to have some idea on the progress.
Best regards
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6817
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

Thanks Ladajo, this is a good sumary of the available information!

happyjack27
Posts: 1439
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm

Post by happyjack27 »

Robthebob wrote:
I dont like to complain, but seriously, wtf.... We've all been following this for like at least 3 years now. I guess the only thing that will calm nerves is for Dr Nebel or Dr Park to come out and say something, only to disappear back into the forest again.
Alien (really Montgomery Burns): "I bring you love!"

Mob: "It brings us love. KILL IT!"

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »


ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

From the first link:

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 106228.pdf
the Earth's
gravitational field is the strongest on the outside, and zero in the center.
I thought this a point lost on many. It came up in a conversation I had the other day, and the guy I was talking with could not grasp the idea. I was speaking with him on relativity. Anyway, back to Polywell...
Last edited by ladajo on Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

Yellow sticky on second link table is very annoying...

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 206734.pdf
Last edited by ladajo on Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

Third link has a nice section discussing concepts of grid cooling and some other good thoughts on a deep space application.


http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 022121.pdf

bennmann
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Location: Southeast US

Post by bennmann »

Those links give a 503 "temporarily down" message.

Someone grabbed a copy before that happened?

The conspirator in me is crying "going dark" lol, in all likelihood it's just site maintenance.

polyill
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:29 am

Post by polyill »

ladajo wrote:Third link has a nice section discussing concepts of grid cooling and some other good thoughts on a deep space application.


http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 022121.pdf
Has it been censored?

zapkitty
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:13 pm

Post by zapkitty »

polyill wrote:
ladajo wrote:Third link has a nice section discussing concepts of grid cooling and some other good thoughts on a deep space application.


http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 022121.pdf
Has it been censored?
Don't know if it's related but portions of the NASA net are down for maintenance over the weekend.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Post by ladajo »

I just hit the link again and it worked fine. Give it another try.

bennmann
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Location: Southeast US

Post by bennmann »

Now I can see them.

AND OH what I would give to have the international community build a polywell on the international space station to test T+T vs p B11 reactions as fuel/thrust (to confirm the theory of course). Maybe an arm, maybe all my appendages.

polyill
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:29 am

Post by polyill »

zapkitty wrote:
polyill wrote:
ladajo wrote:Third link has a nice section discussing concepts of grid cooling and some other good thoughts on a deep space application.


http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 022121.pdf
Has it been censored?
Don't know if it's related but portions of the NASA net are down for maintenance over the weekend.
Nah. I didn't mean the unavailability, but the fact the pdf(at least what i got from that link) has some scrabbled portions in it. Looks like scan artifacts.
Or censor

Image

Post Reply