a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
Presumably his competitors.MSimon wrote:Uh. Who is "the enemy"?Dear Matthew:
Patents pending are like divisions of an army in movement: the less the enemy knows of them, the better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The snakes. The snakes are everyone's enemy. They must be destroyed.MSimon wrote:Uh. Who is "the enemy"?Dear Matthew:
Patents pending are like divisions of an army in movement: the less the enemy knows of them, the better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
BTW, Sterling Allan must have been really hot when he first wrote his article. He has gone back and softened a lot of the most inflamitory rhetoric - wonder why.UPDATE: Andrea commented on this story today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics
There is not “my version” , there is only one version of the Florida Bureau inspection at Leonardo Corporation, as a matter of fact it is the version derived from the actual facts: We have been very glad to receive their visit and we have explained to them all we had to. We agreed with them that we will keep them informed of all our developments and also explained to them that we do not use radioactive materials and do not produce radioactive materials. The persons we talked with are very prepared and expert, they have been right and correct, and I have been honoured to deal with them. What we said beyond this is confidential and I have nothing to add at all. I give no information at all regarding our factory, as I always said, until our production will be officially announced. I can say, and I am delighted to say this, that the Officers of the Florida State I have been contacted from are glad that we are making jobs in Florida with a company that respects the Law. Of course they will have free access to us in our Florida site, also to verify that we do not use radioactive material and we do not produce radioactive material and, also , we agreed that we will not sell in the USA the domestic E-Cats before the due certification, that will certify that no radiations are emitted from the E-Cats outside the body of the E-Cats while they are working.
True, but if you don't also destroy the snake puppeteers, the snakes will come back.Maui wrote:The snakes. The snakes are everyone's enemy. They must be destroyed.MSimon wrote:Uh. Who is "the enemy"?Dear Matthew:
Patents pending are like divisions of an army in movement: the less the enemy knows of them, the better.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In his heart of hearts, Sterling Allan wants to believe. However, I can't see that the substance of his article has changed. Some big questions remain, and Rossi's comment is not responsive. To be fair, Claud asked a very broad question.Kahuna wrote:Rossi's retort:
BTW, Sterling Allan must have been really hot when he first wrote his article. He has gone back and softened a lot of the most inflamitory rhetoric - wonder why.UPDATE: Andrea commented on this story today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics
There is not “my version” , there is only one version of the Florida Bureau inspection at Leonardo Corporation, as a matter of fact it is the version derived from the actual facts: We have been very glad to receive their visit and we have explained to them all we had to. We agreed with them that we will keep them informed of all our developments and also explained to them that we do not use radioactive materials and do not produce radioactive materials. The persons we talked with are very prepared and expert, they have been right and correct, and I have been honoured to deal with them. What we said beyond this is confidential and I have nothing to add at all. I give no information at all regarding our factory, as I always said, until our production will be officially announced. I can say, and I am delighted to say this, that the Officers of the Florida State I have been contacted from are glad that we are making jobs in Florida with a company that respects the Law. Of course they will have free access to us in our Florida site, also to verify that we do not use radioactive material and we do not produce radioactive material and, also , we agreed that we will not sell in the USA the domestic E-Cats before the due certification, that will certify that no radiations are emitted from the E-Cats outside the body of the E-Cats while they are working.
So here’s what your humble writer is thinking: This isn’t a story about Andrea Rossi and the E-Cat. It’s a story about Gary Wright, Steven Krivit, a bunch of follow along bloggers and readers. There isn’t any E-Cat news.
He acknowldged [sic] that no nuclear reactions occur during the process and that only low energy photons in the energy range of 50-100 keV occur within the device.
Perhaps the issue is that some want to combine science and religion.tomclarke wrote: The above tirade does not deserve to be on this site.
Your presumption is that when somone makes an extraordinary claim, with flakey evidence, the precise errors in the evidence must be proven or the claim stands. How can this be done? Often bad experiments are never fully debugged by anyone, and remain with a whole load of unquantified errors.
What happened to 511KeV gammas???KitemanSA wrote:It is just you.
If a bureaucrat comes in and says "we have jurisdiction over nuclear reactions in Florida which includes fission of Uranium or Plutonium or decay of Caesium or Strontium or anything else that produces gamma rays in excesss of 1MeV... (just a fer-instance)... by that kind of definition and all his prior statements, Rossi makes no nuclear reactions.
AR always said "doesn't use radioactive materials, doesn't result in radioactive materials and doesn't emit radiation beyond a certain keV value". Guess the FBRC(?) considers that "non-nuclear".
So, again, nothing new. More yammer. Yawn.
Tick, tock.
I can say green men live in the moon. You can't disprove. But do you take me seriously?KitemanSA wrote:Perhaps the issue is that some want to combine science and religion.tomclarke wrote: The above tirade does not deserve to be on this site.
Your presumption is that when somone makes an extraordinary claim, with flakey evidence, the precise errors in the evidence must be proven or the claim stands. How can this be done? Often bad experiments are never fully debugged by anyone, and remain with a whole load of unquantified errors.
An oft quoted scientific statement is that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs". Which is true.
The converse, an almost religious statement that a "lack of extraordinary proof is proof against the claim" is false. Lack of evidence is NOT evidence of lack. All it does is result in the accurate statement... "not proven".
At this point, from what I have seen, Rossi is not proven... maybe even REALLY not proven. LENR on the other hand is more... not QUITE proven.
LENR being proven true would not surprise me. Rossi being proven true WOULD surprise me. But as yet, not proven.
Tick, tock.
My hypothetical said >1MeV gammas. That is <1MeV.ladajo wrote:What happened to 511KeV gammas???KitemanSA wrote:It is just you.
If a bureaucrat comes in and says "we have jurisdiction over nuclear reactions in Florida which includes fission of Uranium or Plutonium or decay of Caesium or Strontium or anything else that produces gamma rays in excesss of 1MeV... (just a fer-instance)... by that kind of definition and all his prior statements, Rossi makes no nuclear reactions.
AR always said "doesn't use radioactive materials, doesn't result in radioactive materials and doesn't emit radiation beyond a certain keV value". Guess the FBRC(?) considers that "non-nuclear".
So, again, nothing new. More yammer. Yawn.
Tick, tock.