Re: EEStor says something - but not too much
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:07 pm
On to more important matters. . .krenshala, do the lakes in the Austin area ice over during winter or are they totally ice free?
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
What is this "winter" you speak of?GIThruster wrote:On to more important matters. . .krenshala, do the lakes in the Austin area ice over during winter or are they totally ice free?
Hey GIThruster, I went back and read this whole thread. You attempted to spread a misinformation about AFRL and LM doing a study on EESCAM claims. You would fit right in at theestory.com site where they want people to believe they have "healthy debates" about EEScam, but in reality they peddle Dick Weir's fraud based on misinformation like your post? The AFRL emails I posted are worth your time to read unless you don't care for the facts and just want to peddle Dick Weir's fraud like the others over theestory.com who did for years. In case you forgot this is the misinformation you posted:GIThruster wrote:Has there ever been a post in this thread worth the time to read? I can't remember a single one.
GIThruster wrote:I don't have time right now to do the search myself, but both the Air Force Research Lab at Edwards, and Lock-Mart have done studies on EESTore's claims. Lock-Mart is an investor and AFRL was interested for obvious reasons. Anyone who can get the results of those tests would do well to post them. In particular, the results of the testing at Edwards ought to be subject to FOI inquiry if nothing else.
I think you misunderstand. This is not worth my time. Is that clear? This is not an EEStor forum and I have no interest in those forums. You only post here about them, and I am just saying true, no one here thinks this is worth their time. We're AGREEING with you, that this is a farce.papapoe wrote:You would fit right in at theestory.com site where they want people to believe they have "healthy debates" about EEScam, but in reality they peddle Dick Weir's fraud based on misinformation like your post?
I have a problem with people like you who spread misinformation. That's how this EESCAM fraud story was and is kept alive. Why did you LIE about LM and AFRL testing EESUs when they never did? I posted proof with the AFRL emails and yesterday you post there was not a single post worth your time to read in this thread. Are you implying the AFRL emails were not worth your time to read? If you did read AFRL email you wouldn't have posted the following,GIThruster wrote:I think you misunderstand. This is not worth my time. Is that clear? This is not an EEStor forum and I have no interest in those forums. You only post here about them, and I am just saying true, no one here thinks this is worth their time. We're AGREEING with you, that this is a farce.papapoe wrote:You would fit right in at theestory.com site where they want people to believe they have "healthy debates" about EEScam, but in reality they peddle Dick Weir's fraud based on misinformation like your post?
What is your problem? Do you sell batteries for A123 or something?
BTW-I did not start this thread, but there are many threads on this board in which the topics have nothing to do with Polywell that are posted, do you complain about those threads? It's sounding to me you might have stock in The EESCAM Corp that is why you don't want any bad news posted in this thread because you don't want new investors to find out about Dick Weir documented scam. That's one of the reason theestory.ning.com was shut down.papapoe wrote:GIThruster wrote:Has there ever been a post in this thread worth the time to read? I can't remember a single one.
GIThruster wrote:I don't have a problem with this thread existing. I have a problem when you tell me or anyone else that I lied and that if I weren't a liar, I'd read your posts. Your posts are not worth my time. I didn't lie. LockMart did have an agreement with EEStor, and they posted online that AFRL was going to test their caps. That never happened, and if I was not precise enough in my rather casual handling of a completely unimportant topic, oh well. I'm not gonna beat myself up about it.
You are however a very different story. You're deliberately venting your hatred here in the forum, on a topic either no one or almost no one cares about, and making blind accusations at people--at least me, I don't know how many others and I'm not going to waste my time reading back to find out-that are just example of how much a troll you are.
Guess what? We don't need any more trolls here. Guess what? We don't need any holy crusaders here, pretending they're saving us all from the dread evil EEStor, who wants to pick our pockets. Guess what? No one is gonna miss you when you amble off to antagonize, stir up trouble and otherwise prove yourself a troll somewhere else. No joke, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
GIThruster, Keep on posting LIES, you are an outright liar. LM NEVER posted anything online AFRL was going to test their caps. When LM signed the agreement with EESCAM it wasn't caps con Dick Weir was peddling. It was a disruptive EESU that was going to power electric vehicles over 200 miles on one charge and put all lithium battery companies out of business. Now con Dick Weir is peddling he has a disruptive cap that is going to take over the capacitor industry.GIThruster wrote:I don't have a problem with this thread existing. I have a problem when you tell me or anyone else that I lied and that if I weren't a liar, I'd read your posts. Your posts are not worth my time. I didn't lie. LockMart did have an agreement with EEStor, and they posted online that AFRL was going to test their caps. That never happened, and if I was not precise enough in my rather casual handling of a completely unimportant topic, oh well. I'm not gonna beat myself up about it.
pdxpyro, this is the new eestory sitehttp://edensity.ning.com/tbs-place where they are having "healthy debate" in aiding and abetting in Dick Weir's fraud.pdxpyro wrote:Hear, hear!
It took me a couple of his (assuming "his") posts to figure out that responding would be tantamount to troll-feeding.
I do (or did, anyway) have an interest in this saga, so have been following this thread. For the most part, though, I share GT's thoughtful sentiments below.
papapoe wrote:GIThruster, Keep on posting LIES, you are an outright liar. LM NEVER posted anything online AFRL was going to test their caps. When LM signed the agreement with EESCAM it wasn't caps con Dick Weir was peddling. It was a disruptive EESU that was going to power electric vehicles over 200 miles on one charge and put all lithium battery companies out of business. Now con Dick Weir is peddling he has a disruptive cap that is going to take over the capacitor industry.
You would fit right in with your lies at the new eescamstory site and have a nice circle jerk with the scammers there. They will love you.
Is there something wrong with you? So maybe he inferred that they did, and in actuality they didn't and he's just, I dunno, mistaken and not actually a liar. Do you see the problem with your accusations? Nobody HERE (I hope) believes anything is ever coming out of EEStor except vapor. Why are you arguing semantics about it and accusing people of lies (people that actually agree with you that it's a total scam) on a thread that was dead for 4 months on a site that has nothing to do with it? You've let this thing get so far up your ass you can't see straight anymore. Pull it out, take a deep breath, and let it go. Seriously, before you have a stroke or something.papapoe wrote:This is for the people who like to spread lies in the EEScam fraud story. Lockheed Martin NEVER posted anything online AFRL was going to test the EESUs or craps, lol.
Heck, there are still believers in John Keeley, Bessler and Joe Papp. There never is an end for some people. Rational people, on the other hand, move on with life.So is this the end of the story? I've no idea.
These days reducing idiocy to absurdity is a redundancy lost on many, but I appreciated the quote immensely.Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?