Whew! .... looks like the tissue of lies has busted apart ... talk about desperation.
The cognitive dissonance necessary to argue that building a fusion reactor experiment that has NEVER produced net power and will NEVER produce net power is somehow not basic research, is astounding.
You guys are nuts, if fusion was not basic research we'd at least have prototypes, engineering calcs, working drawings not some cartoon sketches with little robot guys and forklifts .... if EMC2 ever get net power out it will be from a discovery of monumental proportions due to BASIC RESEARCH.
You guys are living in the future, sadly it just not our forseeable future, I guess that's how the Mach effect thing can seem so real to you nutters ... come back down to earth and then we can get real about what a rort this has become.
Tax-payer funded basic research.
In the mean time, these make an interesting read. Also notice ZERO mention of Polywell...
http://www.nps.edu/Academics/Institutes ... at_NPS.pdf
And these two as well:
http://www.navalengineers.org/SiteColle ... _Paper.pdf
http://www.navalengineers.org/SiteColle ... tersen.pdf
These provide some depth to some other topics previously discussed, as well as the issue at hand: Polywell as 6.1
http://www.nps.edu/Academics/Institutes ... at_NPS.pdf
And these two as well:
http://www.navalengineers.org/SiteColle ... _Paper.pdf
http://www.navalengineers.org/SiteColle ... tersen.pdf
These provide some depth to some other topics previously discussed, as well as the issue at hand: Polywell as 6.1
-
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm