Search found 144 matches
- Tue May 05, 2009 9:58 pm
- Forum: History
- Topic: What were the energy and power inputs into the WB-6 reactor?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13124
- Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:09 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Helion Energy? Did they beat Tri Alpha? Scam?
- Replies: 76
- Views: 70040
- Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Iran Question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4134
- Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:02 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
If you are interested in pumps, the specifications for ITER can be found at: http://www.iter.org/a/index_nav_4.htm . If I am reading this correctly, the pumping power is about 60,000 liters/second. This is ~ 30 times more than the WB-7. It doesn't take a lot of power. Our system takes ~ 500 watts of...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:12 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
Art: The mirror model is a bit of a handwaving model that I believe Nick Krall came up with. The mirror ratio is calculated from the field where the electron Larmor radius is on the order of the device size. Any smaller field than that will not have adiabatic motion. If particles enter the field nul...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:18 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
Loss fraction = (summation (pi*rl**2))/(4*pi*R**2) where rl is the electron gyroradius and R is the coil radius. The summation is a summation over each of the point cusps. If you calculate rl from one of the coil faces, then there are "effectively" ~ 10 point cusps (fields are larger in the corners ...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:34 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
Art et. al.: A few comments on scaling laws…. To a certain extent we are in the same boat as everyone else as far as the previous experiments go since Dr. Bussard’s health was not good when we started this program and he died before we had a chance to discuss the previous work in any detail. Consequ...
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:08 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
- Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:06 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Maximum size allowed by energy flux constraints
- Replies: 95
- Views: 90442
- Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:17 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
- Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:53 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
Art: Here's where I'm coming from. Obviously, I know what's in the data and I know what it is consistent with. We've known that for several months. However, just because a piece of data is consistent with one model doesn't mean that it's inconsistent with another model. When you compare data and the...
- Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:46 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
- Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:14 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
- Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:32 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
- Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:18 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: The consequences of quasi-neutrality in the cusps
- Replies: 100
- Views: 80749
Here's what we know and what we don't know: 1. We don't have the spatial resolution of the density to see if the cusps are quasi-neutral on the WB-7 2. In one-D simulations the plasma edge (which corresponds to the cusp regions) is not quasi-neutral. Therefore, if the cusps are quasi-neutral it must...