China traditions at their bestladajo wrote: They try pretty much everything else they see.
Search found 3061 matches
- Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:04 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: China experimenting with fusion technologies
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2377
- Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:49 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
I'm not all that up on Archimedes the scientist. He was a pretty good naturalist, but... Archimede was the greatest scientist of his era, we can say that he was the maximum expression of science of his cycle, and he laid the bases for the next scientific cycle. Among the many contributions, he was ...
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:23 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
Your logic is correct if we talk about an existing theory. Than you can disproof it either with a new theory or a new experimental result. Hmmm. Please show me one instance where new theory disproved old. New finding (discoveries, experimental results...) can provide contradictions that disprove ol...
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:36 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
Theory ALWAYS precedes proof. I do not agree. Ideas preceed experiments and experiments generate Theories. It has been like this for most of human discoveries. "Discovery" is not theory nor is it proof. Discovery is DISproof. Disproof generates the need for new theory, but if you believe that the f...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:05 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
Any experiment seeking to PROVE the effect is scientifically inconsequential. It may be valuable for commercial purposes (indeed will be very good for that if it works), but if it can't disprove, it ain't scientific. As I said, science never proves anything. It merely disproves the alternatives. Ex...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:47 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
Lord Jesus, please give us some new physics with an experimental proof before the theoretical model instead of the other way around. Theory ALWAYS precedes proof. I do not agree. Ideas preceed experiments and experiments generate Theories. It has been like this for most of human discoveries. Think ...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:57 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1466841
What a delusional, bizarre and fantastically arrogant dismissal of an excellent report. I suppose you can do better in your sleep than these extraordinarily accomplished PhD's who are at the very top of their field. Shame you're not the one filing for grant monies and demonstrating to the world how...
- Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:21 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Tokamak operation in I mode instead of L or M mode.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1082
Paper:
http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/meetings/P ... xc_1-3.pdf
and slides from latest talk:
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/research/alcato ... a_talk.pdf
some interesting ideas and results. I wonder if they will be able to keep the stability at higher powers.
http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/meetings/P ... xc_1-3.pdf
and slides from latest talk:
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/research/alcato ... a_talk.pdf
some interesting ideas and results. I wonder if they will be able to keep the stability at higher powers.
I still don't see any motivation for them to be funding such studies if they are anywhere close to where they claim to be. The motivation is they need to convince and compel an electrical utility. Any/all evidence that they're correct goes to the issue of warrant for belief, and they need the prope...
The situation is very different than you imagine. BLP hasn't been accepting any investment for years. Rather, they're selling licenses, both here in the States and in Europe. BLP got 10M USD investments from institutional investors in the first half of 2010. They got 0 USD (that reads as ZERO) from...
These last two posts--positive evidence that this is a free forum--not requiring intelligence in the least. Blindly believing BLP claims does not require any intelligence. Questioning their claims does. BLP looks more and more like scientology crap to me. Believe me becouse I am right but do not as...
The big issue here is, we have yet another highly regarded institution, that cannot explain what they've found. ehm... what higly regarded institution? Gen3partners? They are just a small service company doing tests under a payment contract with equipment and machinery and sensors supplied by BLP. ...
A quick look at their website and at another couple of sources tells us that Gen3 partners is a service company, not a research institution. http://www.gen3partners.com/ http://www.insideview.com/directory/gen3-partners-inc Apart from the obvious concern that one might have from a small service comp...