Talk-Polywell.org

.... Compared to your breathtaking leaps of objectivity, and your penetrating intellect, unparalleled by any of us here, (except, ironically, by parallel), who are we but pea-brains? We're destined to simplistically reason that Rossi's repeated contradictory statements, dodgy deceptive self-promoti...

"Why thank you Paul, I have created a team 3 hours after you have given me the idea to use someone else's patent information that you told me about, and then said I am already working on it." Fantastic! I cannot understand what causes your wondering. Everyone allowed to make engineering works on ba...

I was gonna say Steorn first, but their scam was pitifully short lived compared to BLP and Rossi. I couldve sworn there was at least one of these really lurid ones that endured as long as Rossi. Noble gas engine? Been doing the rounds under different guises for 36 years... It is quite funny to put ...

The time is going on and still there is no apparent development so it is getting more probable to be a BS or at least a totally unpractical (for some reasons) tech. I should admit, the first time I learned about BL my first reaction was - total nonsense and I did not even follow what was going on w...

It is clearly possible yet, at this point, seems unlikely; the main reason is that Rossi is still quite active - it requires money, with available tech claimed to have COP above 2 it is difficult to imagine investors incapable to verify it. You may fool "investors" with promises to achieve breakeve...

how can you possibly know he is not a con artist? do you know him personally? I don't know for sure if he is a con artist but on paper he satisfies many criteria for being a con artist. You are giving him too much credit ;o) Too sophisticated, too complex, too long, too risky, too many people are i...

how can you possibly know he is not a con artist? do you know him personally? I don't know for sure if he is a con artist but on paper he satisfies many criteria for being a con artist. You are giving him too much credit ;o) Too sophisticated, too complex, too long, too risky, too many people are i...

re: Krivit: perhaps. though my own communications with him suggest he is pretty straight. if deeply (and rightfully) suspicious of sloppiness and fraud. re: Rossi: 'productive'? evidentially a matter of considerable debate. my own views are clear. At least Rossi is trying to make money and to get r...

re: Krivit: perhaps. though my own communications with him suggest he is pretty straight. if deeply (and rightfully) suspicious of sloppiness and fraud. re: Rossi: 'productive'? evidentially a matter of considerable debate. my own views are clear. At least Rossi is trying to make money and to get r...

>...Krivit wants to prove his "scientific" merit (who cares), while Rossi' goal is more productive... re: Krivit: perhaps. though my own communications with him suggest he is pretty straight. if deeply (and rightfully) suspicious of sloppiness and fraud. re: Rossi: 'productive'? evidentially a matt...

>They used to be good friends I understand

Are you kidding!? Krivit is obsessed man as Rossi; such people may not have friends; they do channel their energy differently: Krivit wants to prove his "scientific" merit (who cares), while Rossi' goal is more productive...

GIThruster, Certification of any kind is a red herring, though. Not worth the time to post as it doesn't mean a thing. Not true. When high energy/temperatures/storage is involved the tests have to cover what happens in the worst case. That can't be done without the product actually working. It's tr...

Edison, America's most prolific inventor EVER had what, 3(?) years of schooling. Obviously he was a fraud. The mill diploma COULD just mean he was poorly advised. That's nonsense. This has nothing to do with people who did not earn normal degrees throughout history. It is ONLY concerned with people...

tomclarke> "I'm posting this to provide a place to discuss GIThruster's alarming anti-science views which have been aired on another thread. Such views are common, and at least one other poster here shares some of these ideas..." Well, it is not a surprise you stigmatize it as an "anti-science" ;o) ...

People today often tend to forget that science is experiment; theory is just what we use to tie experiments together. No, science is experimentation conducted with the express aim of negating a hypothesis derived from a theory. All else is natural history. I do not know what science is and frankly ...