Talk-Polywell.org

Your discussion suggests a lack of basic understanding of fusion reactions. I have already tried to explain this to you, so will attempt to do so one last time. And you was wrong for initially when claimed that to overcome a Coulomb barrier I need many MeV-s of collision energy. b) the required ene...

And no any other interactions like Oppenheimer-Fisher and other nonsenses. The only 'nonsense interactions' are claims like; one beam of particles should transit through another beam and their relative speed (velocity) should be sufficient for that the majority of particles could overcome the Coulo...

I would disagree to the extent of the your thought. I was formally trained in nuclear physics with the concept of the probability of an interaction, so to that point, as a matter of clarification, the word "interaction" would be more appropriate. However, that said, and "interaction" does not a fus...

probability of colliding In nuclear physics nobody uses the term "collision cross section". Chemists - yes. Also first Reserford calculated "scattering cross section". And that is widely used as well. In tipical fusion conditions we should consider only fusion event and its cross section and scatte...

You asked for opinions. You got mine. I gave you some things to look up, in case they were relevant for you. It's for you to do the research and read up to see if its relevant. You appear to have misunderstood the relationship of 'fusion cross section'/'collision cross section'/energy and I say you...

Maybe it is a language issue. But I have provided you with leads, and now it is for you to do work and find out if these are relevant or not to your purposes. I am not the one making claims and asking for recognition. It is for you to show what you want to, but if you do not know physics basics (an...

Is that sarcasm? You are right - I am not physicist. But unlike you I don't mix the immiscible phenomena. "Energy bellow O-P", "pile of particles" It appears that the particles colliding with energy by which the fusion cross-section is maximum , "will be destroyed themselves" via certain another re...

Joseph, This post really does belong in Theory. Most of the physics types will take a look at it there. How long have you been working on this idea? From your posts I take it that you are a Physicist, in an academic role? Thank you. A few years I am thinking on this idea. By education I am not phys...

Here we are a little bit more technical than "other places". Unless you give some proper data and detail no one will be interested in discussing it. As Chris said, when you will file the patent or you will be willing to disclose more info, do advise us and we will comment on it. Good luck. Thanks a...

If it is patentable, then you have not told us all the details. So we should wait until you file the patent, then we can make more comments. Good luck. Thank and good luck you too. But in patent legislation is definited the Method and Useful Device using the Method. I am discussing on Method in pur...

See www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-856264-0.pdf, top of page 6. Your link on cross section of fusion reactions does not work. Here is a working link: http://fds.oup.com/www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-856264-0.pdf See Table 1.2 on page 12 Please note me why Oppenheimer-Phillips and why not convential fusion. Look i...

Giorgio wrote:From what you wrote it looks very similar to the one I linked to.
Do you have more detailed info or description of your proposal?

In many places and for lot of people was enough the above-stated description

a) do you really think that no-one has ever thought to direct two beams of fusible nucleii together? Please, note me who b) the required energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier is many MeV of energy. Required energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier for D+T reaction is about 90 kEV in center-of-mass f...

Giorgio wrote:Check this thread:
viewtopic.php?t=3022

and the related patent:
http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat20110085632.pdf

It is not the same

The Method of Execution of Controlled Nuclear Fusion Reaction Joseph Chikvashvili The Description • It is offered to create two beams of particles of reacting components and to direct them along the same axis and in the same direction but with different arranged moving absolute velocities. So, one ...