Talk-Polywell.org

I'd be more impressed if you could spel hiz nayme.

Duh.

Ummm.

I cannot imagine anything further to say but "we told you so."

Sorry you're butthurt. Maybe if you stopped voting for it.

Good luck.

Good to see it's working again.

Small, nothing ambitious: they slow everything objectionable down and get rid of their 20% enriched U, and we free up five or ten billion. We all see how it works and make plans for the next round of negotiations. A credible beginning. Lots of pretentious and quite frankly tendentious horsepucky by ...

Well, I have a 5" short focal ratio telescope built by a former spy satellite telescope maker. And about twenty of his eyepieces, including a couple pairs for bino-viewers. He built the KH-11's optics, if you know what that means. His name is Al Nagler. A lot of people think he's the best small tele...

Shit, I ain't even sure if I want to argue against this, much less if I should. Unfortunately the hard conservatives mostly oppose it, other than the Libertarian Party. I feel that the Libertarian Party gave up a great deal of their legitimacy on this issue by surrendering on abortion.

Of all the asshole things I don't want to see your Libertardian anti-science anti-psychology Scientologist ass say, anything about PTSD tops the list.

You are the worst thing for anyone who has PTSD that has ever been born of woman.

LOL, I'm sure Obama returns the favor. Derpnowitz is pretty idiotic himself, as far as I can see.

Right, because we always put electrical engineers in charge of the CIA.

Yep: nasty, brutish, and short.

The world's oldest creature is a bristlecone pine tree.

You're lying again.

I mean, assuming they weren't killed by climate change.

Noticed no one answered my question on this thread either.

I appear to be succeeding: Schneibsters ask inconvenient questions.

Your Freudian slips are showing.

choff wrote:Toronto-based

Snicker.

There's no cost breakdown unless you include the carbon offset and the carbon cost.

Breitbart?