Talk-Polywell.org

RERT, i put "climategate" into the debunker. This time i'm posting the second result because it's from a different website. Adding a little variety. If you want to see the first result you can go here: https://www.skepticalscience.com/Climategate-CRU-emails-hacked.htm The second result was: http://w...

RERT, an explanation about how and why they do temperature adjustments. The short answer is they do so to make it more accurate. The following was found by typing "fudge data" into the debunker. it was the first result. i didn't bother posting in the images because it's long and there were a lot, bu...

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax http://2paragraphs.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Ivar-Giaever-Nobel-Prize-winning-climate-change-denier-620x374.jpg https://youtu.be/TCy_UOjEir0 I don' t think you understand science. it's not about people, it's about facts and data and experiment and...

This suffices to reveal your sense of proportion. "Global warming is a hoax. Because it's cold. Today. Where I live." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77GGn-E607E It is important what data point it is. Imagine a race of hydrophobic aliens evolving on a planet similar to Earth. They developed a scien...

This suffices to reveal your sense of proportion. "Global warming is a hoax. Because it's cold. Today. Where I live." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77GGn-E607E It is important what data point it is. Imagine a race of hydrophobic aliens evolving on a planet similar to Earth. They developed a scien...

While the Mars data is interesting, and factors in to our understanding, how is Mars a good control? Or Venus? The conditions and weather variables on those planets are considerably different. For example, completely different atmospheric composition and pressure without the kind of water we have o...

I've copied the full text from the very first result returned from putting the word "mars" into the debunker ( https://cse.google.com:443/cse/publicurl?cx=010604914765216769522:2b_pytebcxg ) Because some people on this form are too lazy or unwilling to do their own due dilligence. Or maybe they just...

Trying to articulate what I feel is one of the more core misunderstandings about science and epistemology in general. It's not about what's popular, it's about what's true, and this relates to evidence and reason. Yes, but it is incredibly presumptuous for a laymen who has only superficially looked ...

pbelter wrote: One data point is enough to refute the entire AGW

This suffices to reveal your sense of proportion.

"Global warming is a hoax. Because it's cold. Today. Where I live."

More on data cooking: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/12/21/homogenization-of-temperature-data-by-the-bureau-of-meteorology/ Before the cooking, the hottest year on record was 1934: https://climateaudit.org/2007/02/15/ushcn-versions/ Maybe you should put these things into the debunker. If you're f...

To expand on the Mars thing, the climates on earth vs mars are ruled by totally different factors. On the point of dust storms, mars climate is primarily ruled by particulates, not so much by co2 and other such gases. Indeed, not only is it's atmospheric composition drastically different, but it is ...

The temperature measurement of 2 different gas jars where one contains several orders of magnitude of CO2 more than that claimed to cause the AGW seems like a good validation setup. If the temperatures significantly increased in the CO2 jar would that validate AGW? If so then the opposite result mu...

The temperature measurement of 2 different gas jars where one contains several orders of magnitude of CO2 more than that claimed to cause the AGW seems like a good validation setup. If the temperatures significantly increased in the CO2 jar would that validate AGW? If so then the opposite result mu...

As Feyman once said "Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts". This is especially true if the experts integrity is questionable. Yes, such as when the extent of their knowledge on the subject is from spending "a day, maybe half a day, on google." !! And not only that, but then they feel t...

You keep saying that 99.9% scientists agree with AGW If by "keep saying" you mean "said once". And no, not scientists in general but climate scientists in particularly. Though admittedly I'm not always clear on that distinction. implying that if so many say so it must be true, Never meant to imply ...