Talk-Polywell.org

..... Your handwaving arguments are not worthy of the label skeptical and betray a deep ignorance of the procedures, materials, and physical pricinples involved in the experiment. TC is inclined to see the reasons excluding the nuclear interactions and he has a good reasons for that from his perspe...

CKay wrote:

Crawdaddy wrote:It is an illustration of my confidence in the reported cold fusion devices.

I think your problem is that you jump to conclusions without thinking critically about information.

It's quit an irony ... If someone has no clue then the skepticism is a best way to hide it even from yourself ;o)

Aside notes: It is likely that the NDA DGT made all test-parties to sign states that the mutual approval is required to allow to go public with the test-results. 1) If result is negative DGT will not approve 2) If result is positive DGT will approve but what insensitives for other parties to go publ...

I took the "may" to be "could be" in context. Still not clear. Do they mean "is permitted to be" or "might possibly be"? It says that the publishing is not prohibited by DGT but also it implies they have no control to make them to publish or/and there are some conditions the publishing may not happ...

I didn't find anything unprofessional about their post. I don't blame them with all the negative and sometimes false comments made. ... I would say to have it at first place was not quite professional. PR would be a much better option to deliver messages they would like to announce. BTW, the nonsen...

ladajo wrote:Now this is funny:

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/v ... 7&start=20

.....

The website appears dead for day...

http://www.pr.com/press-release/389652 and more to the point See: http://www.nanospireinc.com/Fusion.html Group, what is your opinion of the NanoSpire system? The NanoSpire system uses an intense form of cavatation in various forms of industrial processes I am interested in the O-H crystals that ar...

Besides, it is quite unorthodox insight to set the dependency of likelihood of LENR from the mental abilities to see the coherency of proposed mechanisms behind... ;o) I'll take you up on the challenge. Choose your LENR theory and we will see who understand it better, you or me. The issue is that n...

In the same way you may debunk the observation of dark matter or even gravity. Not comparable. Both the results of dark matter and gravity have been observed repeatedly and by many and there are commonly known methods and means for doing that. It is very different with LENR, since the observed phen...

In the same way you may debunk the observation of dark matter or even gravity. Not comparable. Both the results of dark matter and gravity have been observed repeatedly and by many and there are commonly known methods and means for doing that. It is very different with LENR, since the observed phen...

..... (1) the science on which they rest is extraordinary, inherently unlikely, with no coheent theory. (For example WL theory, the nearest candidate for this, does not fit with the claimed experimental evidence, which remains incoherent as would be expected of miscellaneous experimental errors. (2...

The only NDAs I've ever seen were time-based. The entire software industry, consumer electronics industry, computing hardware industry, fashion industry, etc. There are cases where trade secrets may be a permanent stipulation within the NDA, but this is the exception in my experience, not the rule....

The only NDAs I've ever seen were time-based. The entire software industry, consumer electronics industry, computing hardware industry, fashion industry, etc. There are cases where trade secrets may be a permanent stipulation within the NDA, but this is the exception in my experience, not the rule....

What several posters above seem to have missed is that tomclarke does not believe LENR ever happens. More precisely, he has never seen any evidence that it does. As this has been researched over at least 20 years he concludes that it is a fantasy. If there is zero anomalous heat the outcome should ...

stefanbanev, It's definitely not correct in my case ;o) TC does demonstrate in my opinion an extreme POV, so extreme that he deserves to be called a "believer" but it is also correct for you as well, just you sit on an opposite side of the bench. How many times do I have to say it? I don't believe ...