Talk-Polywell.org

https://skepticalscience.com/graphics/Temperature_Composite_500.jpg https://skepticalscience.com/pics/GiaeverStableTemp.jpg https://skepticalscience.com/pics/Consensus_publications.gif https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/Radiative-forcings.svg/600px-Radiative-forcings.svg.png ...

Do CO2 not have any other polluting effects? What about the other stuff that is released by combustible fuel? Keep in mind, the same people that denies AGW are the same people that think our general pollution is okay ... And so the AGW propaganda goes, with a general slander. NOx, SO2, soot, and in...

Happyjack appeals to authority, citing another propaganda piece about "radiative forcing", suggesting he doesn't understand convection and evaporation/condensation as dominant heat transfer modes in the troposphere. hanelyp, in your (apparently) infinite wisdom, can you tell me what are the differe...

Happyjack appeals to authority, citing another propaganda piece about "radiative forcing", suggesting he doesn't understand convection and evaporation/condensation as dominant heat transfer modes in the troposphere. I don't think any climatologists understand convection and evaporation/condensation...

What is disgusting is identifying harmless CO2 emissions with real pollution, that false equivalence being used as a bludgeon against the engine of prosperity. From OSS: http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/radiative-climate-forcing Climate Forcing Climate forcing has to do w...

just published 2 days ago:

it's about political beliefs, rather than conspiracy theories and quackery, but i imagine there are similiar neural correlates.

Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep39589

Just saw this today: Does combatting quackery and pseudoscience through rational argument and ridicule work? http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2016/12/23/does-combatting-quackery-and-pseudoscience-through-rational-argument-and-ridicule-work/ http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/files/2016/12/fpsyg-07-0...

The AGW should be all over this proving that there are no meaningful fluctuations in the Solar radiation presently occurring and getting more funding to Mars, Venus and other climate studies to use them as control group. It's really frustrating to me when arguments are made by people that don't hav...

The zealousy of people like happy trying to prove that everything agrees with their pet theory and there is no doubt, actually convinces me otherwise even further. So instead of looking to research studies for the answers to questions, you find it justified to use the zealots on the other side of t...

pbelter wrote:

happyjack27 wrote: Climate change denial myth debunker

The name calling sure indicates "Siege mentality"

If you must though, I suggest that the term more accurate than "denier" and "denial" would be "infidel" and "infidelity"

I'm calling denial denial and myth myth. Deal with it.

* two data points do not a trend make * and Mars' climate is primarily driven by dust and albedo, not solar variations. I haven't heard this particular research or this spin on the Mars warming. What I read was NASA explaining the warming away as Mars emerging form its own ice age due to its own ve...

Happyjack, your "debunker" is producing garbage. Can you tell us what filter criteria it uses, or is that a secret like the methods used to "homogenize" climate data? it doesn't sound like you're using it right. type a climate change denial myth into the box and hit enter. let me walk you through a...

hanelyp wrote:Happyjack, your "debunker" is producing garbage. Can you tell us what filter criteria it uses, or is that a secret like the methods used to "homogenize" climate data?

it doesn't sound like you're using it right.

type a climate change denial myth into the box and hit enter.

RERT, here's an article explaining the robustness of the 97% figure: Communicating the expert consensus is very important in terms of increasing public awareness of human-caused climate change and support for climate solutions. Thus it's perhaps not surprising that Cook et al. (2013) and its 97% con...

RERT, I decided I might as well post the third result, too. in case you are still left with misconceptions. You can go ahead and do more research yourself by just typing "climategate" into the debunker: https://cse.google.com:443/cse/publicurl?cx=010604914765216769522:2b_pytebcxg you'll find it's su...