Talk-Polywell.org

Is this possibly a joke thread, and I'm just missing the punch line? Or are some people on this board truely disagreeing with the global scientific concensus on AGW? In the same sense that some people really believe the world is 10,000 years old, that the second coming will happen within our lifeti...

"Or are some people on this board truely disagreeing with the global scientific concensus on AGW?" I'm saying and speaking for billions in saying that the consensus among some that AGW exists, in a provably net problematic manner, is a deliberate fraud. It is most notably one perpetrated by Mann an...

Is this possibly a joke thread, and I'm just missing the punch line? Or are some people on this board truely disagreeing with the global scientific concensus on AGW? In the same sense that some people really believe the world is 10,000 years old, that the second coming will happen within our lifeti...

I'm really surprised that a site that prides itself on technical and scientific excellence is laying itself open to the dribble from the climate denial bots.

And furthermore, most global temperature recreations all emphasis that the warming is MOST pronounced at the poles. Presumably that means the unprecedented spike should show up most strongly in Greenland and Vostok. They also say that most variation happens at the poles. And if most of the variatio...

Mind you, I forgot to mention that GISP2 only goes up to 1855 (0.95k year prior to the 1950 radio carbon data reference), any further addition of data is mathturbation without providing a source to corrobarate it!

It's not unprecedented in that spot. You cannot relate central Greenland (or Vostok for that matter) into a global proxy You should restate that as you cannot relate central Greenland or Vostok to a global proxy UNLESS you are trying to show the correlation between CO2 and global temperature. Only ...

It's not unprecedented in that spot. You cannot relate central Greenland (or Vostok for that matter) into a global proxy You should restate that as you cannot relate central Greenland or Vostok to a global proxy UNLESS you are trying to show the correlation between CO2 and global temperature. Only ...

Brazil, tonight http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/692/11361023.jpg dont get much more than that in the 21st century. In the 19th century, we had accumulations of 80cm in Vacaria (1870) and over 2 meters deep snow in 1500m high plateau between Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina (in 1879). last ye...

The accuracy depends on how many phases you intend to compare. But use of phase is an old trick with many applications. Think of each phased "device" as a seperate ranging device. The more ranges from more angles, reduces your AOU with each one added. With synch'd transmitters and a phase discrimin...

GPS is all about the clocks. The atomic synch clocking is how the trangulation is determined. This is some other stuff that goes into it to account for atmospherics, frame drag, and what not, but the core idea is that you know when the signal is sent (encoded in the signal), and you know the timing...

It's not unprecedented in that spot. You cannot relate central Greenland (or Vostok for that matter) into a global proxy

"The generally accepted range for interpretations of climate effects is 30+ years to smooth out cyclical processes (such as the 11-ish year solar cycle)." I suppose it's accepted by people who don't imagine there are longer cycles of significance. That's a proposition that's not merely undemonstrat...

What you're not mentioning is the other side of the coin: the decades of junk science and manufactured doubt paid for by a plutocratic oligarchy that got its extreme money and almost total power from control of access to energy... and who see nothing wrong with quietly spending billions over the de...

What you're not mentioning is the other side of the coin: the decades of junk science and manufactured doubt paid for by a plutocratic oligarchy that got its extreme money and almost total power from control of access to energy... and who see nothing wrong with quietly spending billions over the de...