Talk-Polywell.org

My mistake, thanks for the link.

fyi

http://rt.com/usa/196276-lockheed-nucle ... n-reactor/

LYING??.. DON'T BE SILLY, JUST MISINFORMATION FOR THE SNAKES AND COMPETITION! DO YOU REALLY THINK I WOULD RISK TELLING ANYONE WHERE THE REAL FACTORY IS?? AS FAR AS THE MECHANISM, IF THE REACTOR IS NOT HERE, THAN IT'S NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS, IS IT!! Can't believe this has got to 240.. again, nice to ...

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/27/rossi-declining-magnitude-of-claims/ According to two people who attended a lecture by Sven Kullander on Nov. 23, Rossi is now starting to talk about even smaller energy gains, the same level of energy production scientifically demonstrated and reported by F...

GI wrote:How you could have read it and posted the paradox is not there, is hard to understand.

Not really, you are not the only one who enjoys tequila.

You quote "Section 4 from the original" and point me to an interpretation!?? Here's the original translation with variables correction. http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/200-06/specrel.pdf Your translation seems to be identical to mine. They're the same paper. Section 4 is the historic beginning of the T...

More bluffing and more nonsense. Einstein invented the Twins Paradox and published on it in 1905. I have read the paper and this is not true, maybe you could quote the passage. btw: The math in the paper is nothing more than algebra with a little first year introductory calculus. If you want to con...

Why to outsource it to university, it is a way more secure to hire "scientists" to purify the technology and to form IP portfolio. Time, money, talent, resources etc. If Rossi was IBM or GE with the appropriate research infrastructure already setup, you are right, but this takes years and time is n...

Yeah, but didnt he announce that he wanted to give the UoB the money for the testing and research, once he got the money from his customer? So either the customer did not pay, or Rossi was liing. Or both ;) Once Rossi has a sufficient number of "customers" he apparently has no objective reason to w...

Yes, please enlighten us GIThruster. I have a feeling Johan has forgotten more advanced math than you proclaim to know. You're asking for a real physicist to answer your questions, when a 12 year-old can give you the answers. Are you claiming to be a real physicist ? you're presuming I'm a physicist...

Michelson-Morley experiment and other animations here show it pretty well. http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/LightClock/ In my FOR, this amounts to physical length contraction, if I am not mistaken. I don't buy this, contraction IMO is only an illusion between different FOR's. The po...

Unless you can think of an experiment that will determine whether "clocks in different reference frames keep time differently" it is a meaningless statement. In the above, the experiment is using light speed c to see if my clock is actually running true.C is c unless it isn't, for all FOR. The expe...

If clocks in different frames actually keep times differently (in their FOR), how could one ever measure c to be constant in any frame?
A clock is required to measure c. If the clock runs slow, how could c be measured constant ?

If Focardi is telling the truth, and I see no reason for him to lie, maybe Rossi does have a working unit, but has never actually demonstrated it publicly due to radiation issues, which he hopes to solve in future with enough money. I don't know, Focardi says the gamma rays can be absorbed by a sma...

4) during the process, the system emits gamma rays (shieldable with small thicknesses of lead) that are the signature of a nuclear process Even 100 mw of gammas is a LOT. If it is a significant factor in heat production a small thickness of lead will not help. If we are dealing with nuclear. If it ...