Talk-Polywell.org

Check out the report for the continuation and expansion comment. As for the James Bond stuff, since the US Navy is funding this, they would like to get a small lead time edge on competition, https://www.neco.navy.mil/synopsis_file/N6893609C0125%20_Redacted_JA.pdf Thanks. That is an productive answer.

But, the facts stand, they are not ready to do that. So that in itself is not sad. What would be sad was if they had promising results and the navy pulled the plug. Or, If they just gave up. As long as they are making progress, that is what matters. And in any event, they are now on the make or bre...

Betruger wrote:

polywellfan wrote: I am not an english native speaker

ka ching

And that is prove for what? That I am wrong?

My second point is for the "fan"; "fan" in quotation marks. Because every "fan" must agree with you? Becaus every information has to be interpreted in an optimistic way? If I had known you are so blind believers, I didn't trust your positive interpretations in the first way. By mobbing everyone awa...

I think it is sad to see Polywell without substantial support by the navy at this moment. So you base your entire argument that because they are not executing 8.1 today, that the program is failing? Are you out to lunch mentally or what? Why so agressive?[/quote]See what I'm saying?[/quote] I have ...

get it? Sometimes absence of certain kinds of evidence is itself evidence. The fact that it remains at low low levels and at the fringes of Naval research (and nowhere actually near the propulsion arms of the Navy) says that its technological maturity and confidence has not greatly advanced since t...

Just a strange mindset is my bet. Then call my mindset strange as well. I have been following polywell since before Joe Strout stood up this forum. Although there's no evidence of complete failure, the absence of any actual positive evidence either makes the only *success* that EMC can talk about t...

Also there is the review panel of 60 experts who have recommended continuation and expansion of the current effort. Realy? When? Do you have a link? There is also the possibility that an all out black box project has been under way for years and the public effort is a smoke screen. I think that is ...

Also there is the review panel of 60 experts who have recommended continuation and expansion of the current effort. Realy? When? Do you have a link? There is also the possibility that an all out black box project has been under way for years and the public effort is a smoke screen. I think that is ...

ladajo wrote:

I think it is sad to see Polywell without substantial support by the navy at this moment.

So you base your entire argument that because they are not executing 8.1 today, that the program is failing?

Are you out to lunch mentally or what?

Why so agressive?

I was hoping some BDC has gotten involved with EMC2. Which would be great for a hypothetical BDC named Aneutronic Startup Development Fund Inc. which would be invested solely in EMC2, LPP and Tri-Alpha. Ok, who can help to make Aneutronic Startup Development Fund Inc. reality? Is it necessary to es...

For a "Fan", you do not seem to put much thought and analysis into what you have seen or heard. I gather english is not your native language, and it would seem you are also young. Smells like a troll pushing buttons. Because I don't make the same conclusions? Please, I don't want to destroy your ho...

Trolling? Either that, or cant read ;) Maybe you have some prejudices after ScottL's comment ? I know you want to have hope, that I can read out of the last posts here. But the fact is there aren't good news and they aren't paying 200 Million $ for WB-100 nor ordering at last for WB 8.1 so I think ...

ScottL wrote:

polywellfan wrote:

ladajo wrote:So answer the question. Sorry why?

It seems to be this way.

It's the impression I've got from the last comments in this thread.

So a whole bunch of positive posts = bad news? haha ok.

They aren't so positive. No positive results, etc...

The positive news is, there aren't any (bad) news.

ladajo wrote:So answer the question. Sorry why?

It seems to be this way.

It's the impression I've got from the last comments in this thread.