GIThruster/Paul March,
Any progress? Things going ok?
Wishfully waiting,
Ltgbrown
Search found 198 matches
- Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:45 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1490924
- Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:53 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Near Spherical Magrid
- Replies: 217
- Views: 86928
Ideally they would be on some minimal field trajectory to the wall that could be found with magnetostatic analysis once plasma topology is known. I agree this will drive the optimization of the design. Perhaps there will be a tradeoff between complexity of engineering (invovled with following "some...
- Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:36 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Near Spherical Magrid
- Replies: 217
- Views: 86928
- Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:13 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: ITER Newsline Mention of Pollywell
- Replies: 85
- Views: 37085
In the spirit of trying to practice what I'm preaching, I have decided not to respond to TDPerk's provocative and insulting response to my post. Which you just did! :( All this "drift" is do to the lack of data. When (I say when instead of if in the firm hope that we will get) data is made availabl...
- Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:29 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Superconducting Magnet Victory
- Replies: 22
- Views: 11078
- Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:37 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: FoI for WB7 peer review.
- Replies: 55
- Views: 15685
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:12 am
- Forum: Implications
- Topic: Is Mankind ready for "cheap and clean" energy?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 22274
Also, there is a fundamental question I'm a bit puzzled about with regards to your question: You seem to assume that the use of more energy would be a bad thing. But, I ask you - if we have clean, safe, cheap fusion power - where any and every nation has access to abundant, cheap fuel supplies, whe...
- Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:56 am
- Forum: Implications
- Topic: Is Mankind ready for "cheap and clean" energy?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 22274
Is Mankind ready for "cheap and clean" energy?
I have been wondering for some time about the above question. What if Polywell, or Focus Fusion, or some other source of "clean" and cheap energy is discovered? Are we "ready" for it? First, what do I mean by clean and cheap. By cheap, I mean so inexpensive, that people can begin to discount the cos...
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:10 pm
- Forum: Implications
- Topic: Navy sees the WB8 as power supply for direct energy weapons
- Replies: 34
- Views: 55705
quote]And the scan rate for the E2 is?[/quote] From wikipedia (just to make sure I don't say something I shouldn't), "The APY-9 radar features an Active Electronically Scanned Array, which adds electronic scanning to the mechanical rotation of the radar in its radome." (APY-9 is the radar in the E-2...
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:55 am
- Forum: Implications
- Topic: Navy sees the WB8 as power supply for direct energy weapons
- Replies: 34
- Views: 55705
I was part of the requirements team for the E-2D Hawkeye. I am fairly, actually, very confident we will have significantly more than 11 NM to detect, track, ID, and engage. Don't forget about CEC and why it was created. Coupled with the SM-3 (or whatever they are labeling the version with a terminal...
- Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:27 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Mach Effect progress
- Replies: 2707
- Views: 1490924
GIThruster and Paul, I have been thinking intently about this whole conservation of momentum thing when I thought up a analogy to try to understand what was going on. Let's start with GIThruster's analogy of walking on the surface of the Earth. You said (I am going to do a lot of paraphrasing, so fo...
- Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:16 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: NewSpace 2010: Polywell and Vasimr
- Replies: 149
- Views: 55198
You need to lift the entire spacecraft from our gravity well, not just the thruster and power source itself Sorry, I was using my avaition definition of 1 to 1 thrust to weight, which is thrust equal to the entire weight of the aircraft (or spacecraft), as in able to accelerate in the vertical, not...
- Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:05 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: NewSpace 2010: Polywell and Vasimr
- Replies: 149
- Views: 55198
OK, I am no aeronautical engineer nor a physicist. I know that and so if you all point a fundamental mistake in my reasoning below, I will not be offended nor defensive, so please be gentle! :) I do not think we need a greater than 1 to 1 thrust to weight ratio M-E thruster to get to orbit (and of c...
- Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:29 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
- Replies: 1822
- Views: 1352118
- Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:49 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
- Replies: 1822
- Views: 1352118
I got a response! _________ Thank you for contacting Recovery.gov. It appears that the Recipient did not report and should have because the project wasn’t completed yet. We are looking into this issue. Thank you, ---------------------------------------------------- Recovery.gov Webteam Recovery Acco...